@taskmaster4450le: Leo should detach

DiscoverWavesCommunities

Signup

@taskmaster4450le: Leo should detach | Ecency

RE: RE: Token Price On Parity To HIVE Does Not Mean It Is As Valuable As HIVE

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Token Price On Parity To HIVE Does Not Mean It Is As Valuable As HIVE

View the full context
View the direct parent

taskmaster4450le(81)

Published in

Threespeak

Words

186

Reading

1 min

Listen

Play

Leo should detach from Hive.

Why should LEO do that? Hive is a ledger that stores the data. LEO is already moving outside the Hive ecosystem, involving itself with ETH and, in the future, other platforms. Thus, other than the posting, LEO is expanding more.

Do you have a contractual clause with the whales here on Hive that have called you in to check yourself?

Sorry but dont have Whales who call me. Not in that realm.

However, when people blatantly present a side of things while omitting the entire reality, it is good to point things out as you opt to do. Saying that a the price of LEO passing HIVE means that LEO is more valuable is not correct. By that claim, then SBI, BRO, and a host of other tokens on H-E are move valuable simply because they are worth more than 1 HIVE.

We could also make the claim that HIVE is more valuable than TRON since it is 16 cents versus 3 cents (or whatever the price is). Here again we see the fallacy in that statement.