And you could have carried on with your posts, but writing the text yourself and sourcing the copied part. It was your decision not to and stop posting instead.

Yes, I already told you that I could've carried on without copy/pasting descriptions and I already told you why I stopped.

If one entity can shut you down in an instant without warning, then why would you bother building an audience here? At least give them a chance to correct their mistakes before taking everything away.

As far as I see no other post after was downvoted. What hoops exactly?

I was talking about the whitelisting process. I got through it, most people won't bother and just leave. Not very good for keeping people around don't you think?

You mean that if you take text from someone else, you should source it? :)
They teach that in schools. You, as a content creator, should at least be aware of that.

Why such a condescending attitude? Sure, I agree I should've sourced it and no they don't teach that in schools, at least not here.

Why don't we all start copying text from the internet, because some people on YouTube do it...

You're so off the mark here again trying to paint me as the worst scum of the earth. Making videos and copying some text in the description is common practice. Might not be right, but people accept it since description text is not why people watch videos. Most don't even read them.

I mean, if frigging game companies are fully aware and just fine with channels copy/pasting their game descriptions you wouldn't think that you have to link sources on a blockchain built around the idea of censorship resistance. It just doesn't occur to you.

If it was an article and the core content was text, then it would be a different thing in my eyes.

But yes, I understand sourcing copied text would be legally correct regardless.