There's an intriguing paradox we are facing in our modern world. On one side, we have more opportunities than ever to join communities of like-minded individuals, especially online.
But on the other side, it's becoming increasingly easy and socially acceptable to lead a solitary life, focusing on individual pursuits and personal growth.
This situation stands in stark contrast to the past, where our communities were often predetermined by birth.
We were born into families, neighborhoods, and social circles that largely defined our identities and social interactions.
Moving away from these inherited communities was challenging, both physically and mentally. The prevailing mentality was more rigid, accepting that "it is what it is" and that one's place in society was largely fixed.
Thankfully, the dynamics have changed quite a bit in recent times. The once-rigid mentality has dropped considerably, giving way to a more fluid understanding of community and individual identity.
Now, we're mostly presented with two prevailing streams: the option to go solo, charting our own course through life, or the choice to join new communities that align with our personal values, interests, and goals.
This aspect of individual choice is particularly fascinating to me, as it brings the agency to shape our social landscapes in ways that were previously unimaginable.
Since we're loosely confined to a single mode of social existence. Could it be possible to combine both solitary and community-oriented approaches towards life, recognizing that our needs and desires may change with time and circumstance?
My answer tends to be affirmative. Life is inherently nuanced and seasonal, and our approach to community can reflect this reality.
Sometimes, going solo is incredibly beneficial. Certain periods of solitude allow us to focus intensely on personal projects, engage in deep self-reflection, or explore new interests without the constraints of group expectations.
Because we can truly push our boundaries and challenge our assumptions when we're by ourselves, alone. It's more easier forge our own individual paths without having to adhere to the norms or limitations that sometimes come with being part of a community.
To me, that's one of the best upsides of going solo, a wider vantage point with less pressure to conform, allowing for more authentic self-expression.
Of course, the pendulum swings both ways. There are equally valuable seasons where being part of a community isn't just beneficial, but essential. For example, when facing life challenges or working towards ambitious goals that require collective effort.
In such times, people can pool their resources and efforts to achieve something far greater than what they could accomplish individually.
Communities can be great at providing platforms for collective action, or simply creating a support network that uplifts all its members.
If there's an upside to being part of a community, then it's probably unparalleled opportunities for personal growth in ways that could never happen if one decides to go solo.
Interactions with diverse individuals tends to give a more wholesome approach towards life, we continuously learn, become knowledgeable on diverse topics, expand our perspectives and develop crucial social skills like communication and collaboration.
Because of this aforementioned part about communities, If there's a world where you can only choose one out of the two options of going solo or being part of the community, I'll definitely choose the latter even though I'm quite comfortable with solitude. What about you?
The ideal scenario, however, will probably be to strike a balance between these two approaches in the real world.
Thanks for reading!! Share your thoughts below on the comments.
