Hi, @lighteye, I'm moderator of Snax.
Snax rewards from Steem start today may 23th
. Follow our news on Twitter to keep abreast of all newshttps://twitter.com/SnaxTeam/status/1129803388923916289
- SnaxTeam
Snax does not aim to replace existing social networks. Snax ideas - integration of blockchain, cryptocurrency and Dapps into society by building a fair cross-platform reward system for content authors. Today, people are comfortable writing posts on Twitter and Facebook, ok, we are trying to implement integration with them. Tomorrow other platforms will be popular, including decentralized, we will integrate with them. Our task in this matter is maximum user comfort. You can use those platforms that you consider safe and fair, our task is to give you the opportunity to receive SNAX using the networks you choose.
Let's leave the arbitrariness of politicians and corporations on the conscience of the legislation of specific countries where these violations occur.
You are talking about for receiving rewards Snax by fake accounts. How do you propose to implement it? Cheat using fake accounts (bots)? You yourself say that our https://snax.one/whitepaper.pdf describes a complex mechanism for calculating Attention Rate. You need fake accounts with high Attention Rate for their retweets to have a lot of weight. You can not just take a bot without subscribers, retweets and posts to cheat the rating of another account. Thus we get a vicious circle, you need bots that will promote bots, which will promote bots, etc. The question is why? Does it have any benefit? Isn't it easier to buy SNAX? Of course, you can increase your Attention Rate in an unfair way, but it is much more difficult than simply buying subscribers in any known social network.
RE: Q03 — What Do You Think About The SNAX Reward Algorithm?