![WrongScience.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmcjqhRCBPJvSBFHUdYAm6a45nhwiABgSLnqfBN79EdGjP/WrongScience.png) Atheism is really anti-Christianity + Materialistic Science. I wish it was different. I really wish that Atheism really went hardcore into science, proving every piece, setting up structures of thinking that can improve logic, rationality and science. But that is not what i have found. What i have found is that Atheists defend Modern Materialistic Science as if it were the Holy Bible. Including all the parts that contradict itself. They believe in its infallibility. It appears that they have to believe in its infallibility. So, is Atheism, and thus Modern Materialistic Science, a religion? - - - - - - -

## What about Morals? Do Atheist not believe in God, because they believe they are being rational? Or is it because they want no one above them, meaning, they could be god. Atheism hasn't put forward any moral codes, or stated you should be moral. Almost the opposite, they want to throw out all of Christianity, including the constraints on staying withing moral bounds. So, they want no one watching them, do whatever it is they wish to do. "How dare you tell me what to i should or shouldn't do!" A response very similar to a teenager arguing back against their strict father. Atheists don't even hold to a strictly logical moral code. Things like Universally Preferable Behavior are just dismissed. All the moral teachings from the Bible are crucified whenever they are risen. Even good and evil are discarded. If Atheism is a religion, it is a really bad and dangerous one. Similar to promoting "Do whatever you want, damn the consequences" - - - - - - -

## What about scientific integrity? You would think Atheists would be all over this. But, they are not. They uphold Einstein to be from on-high. Upholding Modern Materialistic Science without question. And there is sooo many questions. If you look into any of the popular theories and laws, you find all kinds of problems. Holes everywhere. Questions abound. And i would expect that those who demand "science" above all else, to seek for the truth in the physics. But, most of what i see is Atheists supporting the text books, as written. If Atheists were extremest for science, they would bring up the Theory of Relativity, and discuss, deeply" * The changing speed of light * That equal areas in equal times applied on the orbit of Mercury is 99.9999% accurate instead of a mere 97% * Where is all the matter? Why did we have to make up "Dark matter" * Why can there be signals travelling faster than the speed of light? None of these questions would be discarded. In fact, they would be catalogued for future theories to be aligned against. Instead what i find is what i have seen from Christianity. "You just don't understand the great book well enough". "How can you, a mere low IQ peon, question the greatest minds ever?" The future will be filled with scientific achievements, and the questions, they will flow. And mankind's knowledge will be catalogued and filed and organized into structures that will make it obvious where we are out of integrity. - - - - - - -

## Atheism and the knee-jerk reaction to God If we were purely scientific, we would state something like: > God could exist or God could not exist. And we cannot scientifically prove either case. So, we will continue with theories that have to include both cases. But Atheists, both, assert that they are being very scientific AND that God doesn't exist. Thus things like Intelligent Design are discarded just because it sounds too much like Christianity. Instead, Atheists double down on chance. It is all random! We are products of chance! Even when it becomes clear that the forces of the universe are soooooooo precise, a little larger or smaller means life, and even, the universe can't exist. Atheist/scientist countered with the multiple-universe hypothesis. That there were million-trillion universes created and we are just the lucky one that made it. All hail randomness! (the million-trillion number is actually small when you consider other things/chances besides the forces being balanced so the universe doesn't just go foop) So much good science is thrown out because God CAN'T exist! Instead of following the data wherever it leads, the Atheists cut off any inquiry/theory that even looks like it is going to towards God may exist. This is not scientific. - - - - - - -

After analyzing, Christianity, Modern Materialistic Science and Atheism may all be religions. None of them being very scientific. Because, the actual way things work gets very woo-woo. Inventions are not random thoughts, but highly time-correlated happenings. The Wright Brothers only beat a French inventor by a week. And others by months. And may have lost to others unknown. (It is a story that in China a person made wings, and flew, presented them to the Emperor and was beheaded on the spot, because someone could use such and fly over the great wall and drop bombs on people) Things only seem random, but there is some force that makes them highly correlated. And it would be very beneficial for humanity to investigate this deeply. Even if it leads to God whispering to human inventors (all of them) about inventions. We will have better science in the future. And one of the big pieces will be this "have to prove/disprove God" will be set aside. One of the things coming is "new species emerging". Instead of just (the assumed) species disappearing (and how dare mankind kill them off), we are seeing species thought dead, reappearing. And we will see new species popping up. This is going to put a bee in the bonnet of Christianity AND Atheism. And will spur sooo much actual science. - - - - - - -

All images in this post are my own original creations.

Ancient Science vs. Modern Nonsense