Kim was a bit like a fish out of water during an interview with Whitney Webb over something Ian Carroll said about her, Whitney, I mean really, is a take no prisoners when it comes to knowing her stuff, where Kim just plays on the headlines. That's sort of like this situation here also, not a lot of background noise mixed into the conversation. There was always going to be the conversation of what to do with Israel in this new realignment, it's not like you can literally give back the entire middle east placed under Arab control and haven't figured into the equation what to do with Israel. The current set up is not a net benefit to the US outside of keeping the strait open to the Mediterranean Sea, all the wars were futile in their objectives. Like Kushner said, Trump isn't a conventional president, though his whole adult life he's been nothing but a zero net gain to himself, he never has liked being the loser among the billionaires, he prides himself on the ruthlessness that took to turn that around, and he comes to expect a turnaround, not even expect, but commands that of others. To him, everything has to be a net gain, if Israel couldn't turn that around, prove to him why Israel is more of a net gain than all the rich Arab countries willing to invest into the middle east to make it investible in the way it could be, I don't think he'd had a problem at all laying waste along the wayside pulling out leaving Israel to defend itself. Especially since he was tired of Bibi letting him down. This is not the conventional way things are done, and I assume a lot of countries were thinking alongside Israel, it would just be a matter of waiting out this administration. The whole power struggle dynamics took that down though, and this wasn't an administration who feared using unconventional weaponry to get what they wanted, the tech bros are ruthless. When Bibi came out and made a statement he knew Israel could become less dependent on the US support, I could tell on his face he'd been given an ultimatum by Trump. Realistically, under a digital imprisonment system, there'd be no need for Israel. Part of this accord peace nonsense they have guaranteed the Arab countries if they move toward the domestication of militaries to control the populace, they'll have US backed guarantees for life of keeping them in power. So for Israel, the choice was either them or the Palestinians, but it was never Bibi like people think, he was losing the internal war from both sides, the US siding with the ultra extremist within the Israeli government, Bibi was being undermined by both. You may not believe me, but I am getting pretty close to proving it now. Part of that goes back over a decade ago in an interview where he made the statement that the one thing standing between the rebuilding of the temple mound, was himself, and that he'd never let the extremist have their way. Now these same extremist are salivating behind him being empowered by the tech bros, and they do expect Bibi to step aside, with what time he does have left, he is going to ensure the path to Israel's survival. I am sure he has done things in his life that has kept him up at night, but those things were structured with discipline, limits, with no recourse they could have been done differently, but this, no, not this, not outright genocide but he knows what is standing behind him, he knows what is coming, and he knows he will not be here to stop them if this so called new paradigm for the regions doesn't work out. There isn't much a workaround that can happen outside Israel becoming an expanded US military base that will replace other military bases in the region, and ensure the power behind those who have aligned into this new paradigm, and those installed into, that they, their families will reign forever in the concept of digitally controlling their populace behaviors.