It's probably a done deal by now with the market so saturated and people earning incentives for blogging on more popular platforms. The no to low incentive platforms have gained popularity over the years that has given them a study flow of participants. Then there's that problem that even if Hive could grow to those standards, the system can't handle that. Something someone wrote about years ago. Hive, apparently, can't handle becoming an Instagram, FB, X type of platform. I don't know if that still holds true. At this point, you'd have to offer incentives large enough to entice people to sign up. Like blog on Hive for a year, write so many post, engage with posters, enter to win 5000 hive, or if you want intellectual participation, enter to win 5000 of hive to put toward college education writing about college experiences, what you are planning to major on, etc., because the field is loaded and it would take quite a bit to offer people to even take a look at Hive. I think Snapie was a good idea, but same applies to that, you got a loaded field of similar sites people can and have spent their time on. The system now where everyone gets ten upvotes, and to make it count it has to be 26 cents, isn't going to hit it really.
RE: Introducing Hive Report Card: A Tool to Analyse Content Complexity, User History, and More!