It makes for good fear mongering propaganda but not even the elites want to live in a world so contaminated by nuclear holocaust for decades. When he ask does Trump even know what he's talking about when it comes to nuclear. Yes he does. He said so in an interview with Tucker Carlson, if I remember right it was his first interview to Tucker after he left office last time. Trump said there were two N words you were never allowed to talk about. One was nuclear and the other was the nasty, which was biological weaponry. Now granted many consider covid/vaccines as a biological weapons, which is likely true, and given it's also more likely than not Trump was just as much behind it as all those accused but a nuclear strike is much more environmentally damaging, by a far margin. Now I wouldn't put it past him for a non nuclear strike, and Trump said we were going to see things in this country we never seen before, and I am of the firm belief if they are going to build someplace like the Bronx back better, it would come via a demolition crew, and if it does would it even come on Trump's watch, he likes others to do his dirty deeds. About the most compelling evidence one has that it might, is Pete Hegseth as I am also firm that Trump brought him in to lay waste to him, because he views him foolish enough to be that expendable. Experienced military heads just aren't that stupid. They are, in my opinion, laying the ground work already. Sen Tammy Duckworth calling him out in a congressional hearing, straight out telling him he lacks the experience for the job and he's has spent billions already on missions that accomplished nothing in return for the money spent. She didn't mince words. There is also those reports that he okayed decisions without Trump's approval. Right now, he's a ticking time bomb. He's infamous for his thoughts when he was serving, never could figure out why we just didn't go in and lay waste to the enemy. That's how inexperienced he is. You lay waste to them, and more just take their place. That's what they've been doing, exterminating what they consider who the problem makers are, it happened in Ukraine, and it's happening in Gaza, but unlike Ukraine, ideologies are way different, and as they are finding out, very hard to kill.

One would/could also factor in the Lugar effect, Richard Lugar, who alongside Obama got Ukraine to disarm themselves of all old weaponry laying around. Which made it a lot easier for Europe and the US to empty their closets of all old weaponry, conveniently getting paid for them as they did it. A disarmed populace is no challenge for a country like Russia, but neither is a country using outdated weaponry. This whole war has been a great selling point/justification for modernization of European weaponry, you heighten the risk, it's rises the stakes, you rise the stakes, you rise the amount taxpayers will pay for the upgrade. In a world where western countries have pretty much been neutral to any major wars, the commoners become complacent, if there's no urgency to the matter, to them there shouldn't be an enormous increase of funding by the taxpayers, so they have to create it. After they create it, they have to create the capacity to produce it, because, after all, the situation has become urgent. So now one is on about the Kushner effect. Where they've been over the history of the last seventy five years to see what works and what didn't work. The reconstruction period and industrial revolution, worked. That's exactly where, if there were to be non nuclear hits on Europe or the US, would come in and to what extent that's planned, that would be the concerning point as could they produce enough weapons for everything they are trying to deconstruct, if that's what they are up to, because a lot more damage can be done when weapons are spread to thin, which in itself is concerning because what they determined in that seventy five year period doesn't work, and that is religion, they'd rather convince the next generation that is people like Zuckerburg and Musk who be the ones influencing them the most, and that's right out of the mouth of Kushner himself.

One thing in the video though that Ridder doesn't embellish upon, well he did a bit because he said those two subs could be out looking for the mother load Russian sub, or Russia could be out looking for movement of our subs, this cat and mouse game, that may hold true. I highly doubt in a bid to blow them up, they are, after all, nuclear subs, and the devastating effect that would have on our oceans would be beyond compare to anything in history. It's this supposed new technology that they used to make military equipment inoperable in Syria that made it impossible for Syria to advance, could they do that to a submarine would be the big question, and if they could, what happens if it just lays on the bottom of the ocean floor. Scary thoughts for sure where this is going with the bigger question being if this is all planned, who ends up being the next target(s) and how much destruction would they be phasing in at a time. So far the pattern has gone by who owes the world economies the most, or the world banks are doling them out the largest sums, Italy, Ukraine, Gaza then ?