They called them the architects of the war, I beg to differ on that. It's pretty conclusive who the architects were and they need to be investigated, there are only two individuals who had the motivation, a financial one, to launch a false flag on Oct 7th. This comment below is from a different site I posted it on earlier today.

Wonder when they will issue an arrest warrant for Jared Kushner, the true architect of the war on Gaza doing the bidding of then President Trump for his new paradigm for the region, both of them should have arrest warrants issued for them.

To show the depth of Kushner's intent to go after Gaza on behalf on Arab investors who committed fifty billion to invest in Gaza if Hamas was first removed, one of several statements by Kushners was nobody is going to throw good money after bad. He stated his intent to go after what he described the terrorist as elephants in the room when he said David Freeman would come into his office and tell him we have to deal with two Israeli stabbings and I told him to stop chasing rabbits. We need to go after the elephants. If you don't solve the underlying problem, none of this is going away.

When he couldn't get Netanyahu or Abbas to agree to new boundaries, he decided to draw his own stating that boundaries have historically changed over time anyway.

Jared Kushner: "The boundaries of E. Jerusalem have changed like eight times over the course of history as well. So when they were saying that I said well maybe we could expand E. Jerusalem, give them a different part of it. So, it's one of these things that your pragmatic about it, there's ways to solve a lot of these different issues if you want to do it, and what we found with Abbas is that there wasn't a great desire to engage because he was protecting the status quo, which was leading to a lot of inflows of money.

That's what I saw was this kids situation, since both parties were doing that I just went and started drawing my own map. I basically just said, okay I don't really care what happened before, think about the middle east. A lot of it is just arbitrary lines drawn by foreigners anyway. Go back to Sykes Picot and you can argue there's a lot of lines, again as I started unraveling this history, I was realizing that a lot of this was not as illogical or sacrosanct as everyone thought it was. So basically I says, I said ok, let me come up with a 2017 version. What I am basically going to do is look at, if you go back to 2006, Israel unilaterally withdrew all their settlers from Gaza, and it was a political disaster. What did they get for it. They left all these greenhouses, they left all this industry, it was all destroyed, end up with a group, terrorist groups took over and since then they've been firing rockets into Israel, Israel has been less safe since their withdrawal, Oct 7th proved that. But this is even before that, I said there's no way Israel uprooting any of these settlers. So I said let me just say I want to give the Palestinians a state. Let me figure out how I can draw a line and take all the places where there are settlers and figure out how do you swap land here and there. The make whatever is not continuous, continuous today. You got tunnels, you got bridges, all these different things, how do you make it connectable, sort of give you a functioning state and go from there. So I started drawing the lines and I figured I'd let each party react to it one way or the other. We ended up putting it out, again, I fought a lot with Bibi andhis team, I redrew this on the map, you can't have this, you can't have that, so we'd move the line here and there but that is how I started. I was never able to get the Palestinians to engage off of that map to say we want this but.

**
Israel's had the Golan since '67 war. Syria's never giving it up, so I said let's just recognize it - it moves things forward, the more of these like stupid conflicts allowed to eist, the ore it'd be there. The middle east has a natural negative inertia to it that's been created over the years, maybe its customs and traditions, but I'd say in like 2017 what was new to the situation was two things, one was president Trump, myself as proxy, and then MBS, and with those two dynamics we were to disrupt the inertia and really change the paradigm of what was there.
-You have this other line in the book where you say why recognizing Israel's annexation of the Golan was a powerful opportunity to stand for the truth. That felt like very moral language, for example, I don't imagine you'd say, oh, so let's also stand for the truth, if the fact, you know, the one China policy doesn't make any sense in direction, so it shouldn't an independent county call Taiwan, you wouldn't stand for that truth...
Kushner: Well, yeah, yeah, well that's a truth that didn't conflict with one of our strategic interests

**
Kushner: How do you swap land here and there. I share a lot of it with Bibi, he'd say you can't do that.

**
Bibi says no thanks, an obstructionist, rejectionist, he's committed himself to Israel for a long time. Maybe too long in my opinion.

**
Kushner: He (Trump) didn't have faith that Bibi would come through, but I think he was kind of in his mind to try challenge Bibi to say, "you're not going to come through, you're not going to come through, to try make Bibi prove to him he was going to come through."

**
Kushner: Abbas flies in on a sixty-million-dollar jet. He comes in, pulls out a cigarette, somebody lights it, and I am like is this guy running refugees or a king.

**
Kushner: Abraham Accords was starting to collapse the pocket around them, we were offering them a golden bridge around them and basically feel at some point he'd go over the bridge.

**
Kushner: Momentum is the most valuable thing to seek with Bibi. I was with him after he lost the election, not a lost election, he was trying to form a coalition, somebody put a knife in his back, and he basically lost it.
I was with him the next day, we thought we were going to announce something and move forward, and he was pretty despondent. We met the next day and he would basically, I figure, let me ask him questions about his history, his story, I mean he's a historic figure tht's been through so many historic iterations, and he told me, "when I was a politician I would always try to get little wins because little wins little wins lead to bigger wins and then bigger wins and momentum is a very hard thing to get." We left the region with momentum, again the last piece, so we set up Bahrain to do the deal with Israel. Saudi was watching this closely. We get to Saudi to allow us to put flights over SA between SA & UAE than in addition to that we need you to solve the issue with us in Qatar, we went through and got that done, which, by the way, was very, very intense. So, I finished that on Jan 5th than flew back to the US thinking I would have a very quiet last couple of weeks in office, that turned out to be the case.

**

**

Kushner: We went forward, and we were able to create the peace deals. Then we moved forward in the region, and we felt S Arabia had the ability to a normalization deal. And we had worked with the Biden administration in order to, um, in help them, ah, get that pathway to follow the pathway we were in. So now you move forward three years to the attack, which was awful.

**

Kushner: (on MBS) I think he's accomplished way more than anyone could have expected. I think the cool thing is we're just getting warmed up. You think about these projects, he's a very out of the box thinker, eh, I see that he's getting better and better, the ministers around him, again, it's like sitting with a leadership team of a start up, they're getting better and better, they're competitive with eah other but in a friendly way and I think there's a real ambition and appetite for risk there that you dn't see in a lot of countries that have the resources and you think about the location. They have access in the gulf right now, which is so bullish there, you have access to the Asian market where there's massive, massive growth, so you look at the circumforance around them and there's four billion people, you got established markets, you got emerging markets, you have net surplus because of their oil trade. They're making massive investments in their renewable. They're being a true leader, so I was very, without him, I don't think we'd been able to turn the tide in the region. I still very optimistic talking about the funding with Israel, I don't think now it's a question of if, but when, how and for what.

**

Trump first statement after the attack on Oct 7th: I'll never forget the day Bibi Netanyahu let us down. The night before it was supposed to happen (assassination of Soleimani) I get a call that Israel will not be taking part in the attack.

**

The Oct 7th attack came three days before a convention to move forward on the Abraham Accords that was planned in anticipation of the final regulatory approval, after initial approval went through during Bibi time away from office, that didn't succeed in it's regulatory approval after Bibi's re-election of a planned Arab majority stake in Israel's largest bank Phoenix. Bibi, once again, let Trump down, and Kushner's and his new planned paradigm for the region. Notice how Kushner describes Israel as having been the last piece they needed, it's not only telling how they put this plan into place with oil rich Arab nations, which Kushner describes as doing the financials first and the political later, in order to try convince Israel and the Palestinians to go along with it, and as far as Israel having been the last piece by dragging Netanyahu across the middle east after his back stabbing election lost, them being last wasn't true in the real sense of the word, the final piece would have been getting the Palestinians aboard, which they failed to do and which, ultimately they paid the price for.

All this is what the international court needs to be investigating, these words are open admission of interested parties who had all the motive in the world to commit genocide against innocent bystanders who leader refused to go along with their plan. They need arrest warrants for Trump, Kushner, Biden, Harris and possible Elon Musk for his given statement after the attack encouraged its complicities of lies.