Just a stark reminder of our complete and utter reliance on centralization and how systemic failure is much more possible than it should be.

Well this is suppose to be a decentralized chain yet I can post comments and up vote post but I can't post articles I write. Apparently, or it looks like, someone hacked into my hive keychain, or at least there's a set of keys in there that aren't mine. I never got around to putting my keys in there. So decentralization sucks just as much as centralization, especially when somehow no one knows how to recover my account.

With that said, I left you a comment last night but ended up deleting it after it wouldn't post. Thought it was the start of something else wrong with my account but I guess it wasn't. I've never seen you at a loss for words, especially humorous ones. I think a lot of people really don't see what's been at play here and they really think it matters who gets in office. The reality is this whole political prosecution thing was staged from the beginning. Back in 2017 a guy named James Sherk, a domestic council member under Trump, wanted to find a way to take what he called a constitutional theory that presidents have immunity up to the SC to test it. It was also in 2017 that Liz Cheney decide to hop onto the political bandwagon and ran for office. But this wasn't really about immunity for presidents, this was all about immunity for the executive branch. Reason why was in case of the possibility that something would backfire in the covid scam and vaccine of things. Liz vested interest in playing along to help build a string of political prosecutions would be to protect her dad, who served under Bush as VP where gain of function on corona virus started. Now, with five states getting ready to sue the pharmaceutical companies, it appears their fears were warranted. Instead of write the whole thing out again, I wrote the majority of it in a comment on anther blog site earlier today, to see how it's all run down, just ignore the first few sentences as it's more on topic to the discussion there but the rest is more specific to what I wanted to say last night.

Will only happen now if the evidence comes from outside the executive branch of government. All that evidence has been destroyed. So at this point, it's never going to happen. Unless some underling wants to become a whistle blower that gives them the smoking gun. Reason is because the presidential immunity thing wasn't just about Trump, as many are misled to believe, as usual. The basis of the SC ruling was on executive branch members being able to function unfettered by the fear of prosecution. They all have immunity now. Everyone, including Fauci. Up to and including anyone, like big Pharma, conversations with executive branch members can't come within the scope of the executive branch conducted business with big pharma. Now, if someone within big pharma has a smoking gun of proof whereas they or it wasn't connected to conversations/documents with the executive branch, and that proof shows obvious egregious behavior outside the authority of the executive branch to have been conducted, than and only than can they compel the executive branch to hand over any documents/transcripts of conversations recorded on the subject matter to verify it warrants prosecution of executive branch members.

Now part two will be coming soon to a theater near you. That will be the documents case, if it unfolds like I think it will, and Meese's Amicus Curiae gets removed as a Writ and introduced as a friend of the court advisory brief, what will transpire is the SC picking it apart to come up with what is being labeled as "modernization for todays times" special council authority. Of which, pay special attention to the cases Meese picked to be a "friend of the court" advisor on the matter. Within that you'll find, in the end, that, if I am right, all the underlings in the executive branch will get protected by immunity from prosecution. Guys, like, ones who carry documents around Mar A Lago at the behest of their executive branch head honchos'. But, if Meese's AC isn't introduced into the documents case, which is coming up on appeal, and is let stand as a Writ, meaning a case to be heard before the end of the SC term n Sept, expect the same result for the underlings. In that regard, it will take the same thing as above to convict any underling of wrong doing, the evidence will have to exist outside the executive that is compelling enough to sit the underling down and threaten him with 20 years if he doesn't talk.

That's why Trump can sit at the end of this conversation in the video, and say off the cuff stuff like tell me this is our last election, because, moving forward, as the way they are setting this up, right under your nose, is that the executive branch, or our government if you want to say, will no longer be held accountable for their actions to the American people unless first the American people can prove without a doubt, that something obviously egregious has occurred outside the scope of executive authority to have done.
Will only happen now if the evidence comes from outside the executive branch of government. All that evidence has been destroyed. So at this point, it's never going to happen. Unless some underling wants to become a whistle blower that gives them the smoking gun. Reason is because the presidential immunity thing wasn't just about Trump, as many are misled to believe, as usual. The basis of the SC ruling was on executive branch members being able to function unfettered by the fear of prosecution. They all have immunity now. Everyone, including Fauci. Up to and including anyone, like big Pharma, conversations with executive branch members can't come within the scope of the executive branch conducted business with big pharma. Now, if someone within big pharma has a smoking gun of proof whereas they or it wasn't connected to conversations/documents with the executive branch, and that proof shows obvious egregious behavior outside the authority of the executive branch to have been conducted, than and only than can they compel the executive branch to hand over any documents/transcripts of conversations recorded on the subject matter to verify it warrants prosecution of executive branch members.

Now part two will be coming soon to a theater near you. That will be the documents case, if it unfolds like I think it will, and Meese's Amicus Curiae gets removed as a Writ and introduced as a friend of the court advisory brief, what will transpire is the SC picking it apart to come up with what is being labeled as "modernization for todays times" special council authority. Of which, pay special attention to the cases Meese picked to be a "friend of the court" advisor on the matter. Within that you'll find, in the end, that, if I am right, all the underlings in the executive branch will get protected by immunity from prosecution. Guys, like, ones who carry documents around Mar A Lago at the behest of their executive branch head honchos'. But, if Meese's AC isn't introduced into the documents case, which is coming up on appeal, and is let stand as a Writ, meaning a case to be heard before the end of the SC term n Sept, expect the same result for the underlings. In that regard, it will take the same thing as above to convict any underling of wrong doing, the evidence will have to exist outside the executive that is compelling enough to sit the underling down and threaten him with 20 years if he doesn't talk.

That's why Trump can sit at the end of this conversation in the video, and say off the cuff stuff like tell me this is our last election, because, moving forward, as the way they are setting this up, right under your nose, is that the executive branch, or our government if you want to say, will no longer be held accountable for their actions to the American people unless first the American people can prove without a doubt, that something obviously egregious has occurred outside the scope of executive authority to have done.