I do know that in the global partnership agreements it was Mexico who, as each country has to have something to offer up towards the agenda, agreed to develop a crypto system. If I were asked to speculate, I think the goal is to link energy to crypto. Meaning a different financial mechanism used to pay for energy cost while using blockchain technology to also be able to shut off accounts anywhere in the world, in other words a complete energy control mechanism. No loss to investors period. Part of a ideology of we've seen over the decades that which works and that which doesn't work, they plan on fixing all that didn't work. (I guess they are so much smarter than their peers)

That was the idea behind the pandemic (fixing the 2030 crash of global financial systems due to baby boomer generation of having 4 retirees to every 2 workers) , the idea behind Ukraine and the idea behind Gaza, these were all systems heavily reliant on the global banking systems, international banking, social government sponsored program.

Germany is the one who had been running all over the continent making these agreements. You either invest in green technologies or you don't get international bank funding. How they set the whole thing up was by guarantying investors no losses if they built the technology for green energy backed by tax payer money into development bank programs. They only pay if investors lose. So when you say "Europe is", well Europe's been running out the door with a lot of stuff, they've been successful with it because they guarantee to investors they'll see no losses, no losses means no losses, otherwise the whole paradigm falls apart. The only way you can guarantee it doesn't fall back on them or the investors is to make sure everybody pays or else.