There are at least half a dozen celebrities if not more who have come out about having gotten AD, or had gotten the vaccine knowing they had AD and are now struggling worse with it than they were before. One or two of them, if I recall correctly have died as a result. Whether or not she was diagnosed afterwards chances are greater than not that at some point she would have developed it, the vaccine doesn't give it to you the vaccine puts it on speed dial. The funny thing is that you can't mention the vaccine without getting warned but she has videos plastered all over utube discussing it. She also has the money for high powered attorneys, so instead of the government coming out and warning you about it they settle with her and she becomes the public data material sheet that Moderna and the government doesn't want to admit to for liability reasons. That's the only logical conclusion she doesn't get shut down by utube. Public admittance without the liability involved, she becomes, under a settlement disclosure, their poster girl. They probably settled with her over her sisters death as far as that goes. I think Jamie Foxx refusal to talk about it was likely settled under the table but at that point they didn't need a poster child for warning people, it was already established. Al Roker probably just as likely settled with them, but these are high profile people with money who could do a lot more damage that would lead to settling with millions of others hurt by the product if they didn't pay them to keep their mouths shuts to already established fact. Reminds me of a couple of other high profile podcasters out there, during an interview one night the guy was asked why do you think your wife gets censored but you haven't fallen to that censorship. If you seen how deeply the deception runs, and I am telling you it's extremely deep and shocking without giving away what I've found on it, with this husband and wife team one lends credibility (censored one) to what the uncensored one is saying. Again, public admittance without the liability attached. There's a quoted term for it but I am saving that for later.

As far as Nikki Haley I wouldn't be surprised at all if Trump picks her as VP claiming she's earned it. I go back to what he said about Dixon here in Michigan whom he promised to help finance her campaign with Betsy DeVos than when she claimed she wasn't getting the financial support promised Trump said that if she wasn't taking in the money she wasn't out there saying the right things to bring attention to herself. Like polly wanna a cracker nut stuff. Nikki's been out there saying some really off the wall stuff. Over on Disqus the other day someone put up a video of her being really off the cuff. I was OMG is that for real, or something to that effect. If you haven't seen it let me know and I'll go fetch up the link to it for you. There's been some millionaire also giving her big bucks, so the thought hasn't escaped me that she would be a good avenue for those who don't want to openly back Trump to back channel money into the race, they'll come out later and say something to the effect they'd never given the money if they had known. He'll just stand up there and say something like he did with Lindsay Graham at one of his fake rally's in SC last summer when the crowd booed Graham, "we're gonna like, we're gonna like him". Picking her would give him brownie points at the convention also. Just short of picking another Mike Pence. Just saying because I'd really hate the thought he'd pick Vivek, he does that and it's an open admission he knew all along, because even if he didn't know back than, which I doubt, he surely has to know by now that the patent that went into the LNP was based on failed patent technology, which buying up those patents were his specialty con job.