I keep forgetting to mention this but on New Years Eve I was watching Fireworks From Around the World with my cousin. New Zealand had the most funky fireworks I'd ever seen. Shooting them out of some tower like video. My cousin was like "they think that's a good fireworks show?". I told her it seemed rather mundane, like something a bunch of teenagers would think up as being fun to do. Places like Singapore, Hong Kong and a couple other eastern places had it going on. Never seen fireworks displayed off the tops of multiple buildings. There's no western countries that has a thing on them, that's for sure.

All the talk about Swift's political influencing, if they are using it that way, one of the biggest points in messaging that I think they've (commentators) have missed when it comes to Kelce is it's almost always, and I haven't seen one yet that addresses it any other way, but I guess there's a chance there's one out there, Travis Kelce tight end for KCC, or KCC tight end Travis Kelce, he's not or it can't be KCC's Travis Kelce, they always have to mention he's a "tight end". It's subliminal messaging.

The women with the flute...no one stops to ask how she discovered she could get her flute to toot. lol.

Just food for thought but Biden Admin probably didn't sign that paperwork for natural gas because it was probably for domestic natural gas. They have a huge refinery coming online in Africa this year. Suppose to one out of three of them. I know they were in the testing phase not to long ago so it may be online now or getting ready to. The refinery is capable of converting oil into LNG. Also people commenting about him not filling the reserve back up in my opinion is because they are using it for Europe's transition, something they weren't (democrats) suppose to do, than Trump made the deal with Europe and they started using it. As long as it sits there half empty they can still buy in bulk at a cheaper rate from SA. SA is much closer to Africa than America, and the refinery coming online is right below the opening a bit from the Red Sea where all the actions been taking place. I just don't think they will buy oil from SA, ship it all the back to the US to refine it here than ship it back. I am not even sure the US has one of those state of art refineries, they may have. But it wouldn't allow them to compete with China and India over Europe's business as it wouldn't be cost effective to do such. They'd want a country, like Africa, without all the regulatory controls in place with hoards of cheap labor, and be as close as possible to where it's going to be shipped.

That's what the big deal is about over Gaza, it's going to become a hub for export/import of energy products into Europe's back door. First though, as Kushner pointed out in that interview with Al Jazeera, they have to do the "political" part, which he would emphasize what he meant by that, (which we are witnessing) only the financial part, which amounts to "if you can dream it you can build it". They can't go in and build it until they take out Hamas (which Kushner refers to it as reducing the poverty rate by fifty percent) (lol, people are so naivete) and all the tunnel systems underneath the ground. The Arab countries will not build Gaza with the committed fifty billion dollars as long as Hamas is capable of continuing conflicts with Israel or blowing up brand new buildings by packing explosive underneath the ground.

So far it looks as though Israel may relent to a international coalition of Arabs to control Gaza with western backed guarantees of security if they can build a buffer zone. Everyone is freaking out it's taking Palestinian land but in the end Palestine will be built back better and be overseen by Arabs who'll have no problem keeping the peace by knocking off anyone who gets out of line, which in reality, is the only way it can happen and is the only way they run their own countries.

Built back better, which I am assuming most consider just to be retrofitting old houses and buildings into green energy efficiency, in a lot of circumstances will not be possible. So expect as they keep pushing the new agenda that a lot of countries are going to get hit to destroy structures to replace them in their new fourth industrial revolution green energy style. My opinion would be that the list and events are structured to the most burdensome cost to governments across the globe. It thus far falls into line of that.

The virus jumping from China to Italy, outside of Greece Italy has ran a deficit to their gross domestic products for over a decade and had the world's oldest population of elderly which was burdensome on the social safety programs.

The virus unleashed onto the global community. The biggest threat were to people with diabetes, heart disease and cancer. The three highest costly diseases in medical cost to world governments.

On to Ukraine, costing billions from world banking systems due to corruption and an aging population of which they had already met four retirees for every two workers.

On to Gaza, also costing billions to world banking systems.

Who's next? My money is on Finland with the second highest population of elderly or Poland with it's strong ties of nationalism, the latter not costly just problematic when you want to rule everybody by a iron fist. This or that was George W Bush's "China was the right model all along" motto. This whole thing started under George Bush. Taking us out of the international treat for biological weapons. Messing with the corona virus, and the mass migration out of the middle east into Europe.