"I believe the first intention of those behind the attacks on 7th October was the destruction of Israel."

This is the part I can't put my finger on. Your opinion piece reads more like a coffee table book. It sells good but it's missing that infamous part from a A Few Good Men "deep down in places you don't talk about at parties" concept. The bigger question is did Netanyahu come back because of reports of an attack on Israel or did Netanyahu come back because he was in the know of the attack on Israel. One will get you where you need to go if this was an attack to take Israel down. The other not if he came back to intervene to stop the fall. The latter gives better insight into why they "supposedly" didn't see this coming, which no one believes, if they seen it and didn't stop it why?....because he had to shown them what they were headed for on the trajectory the left leaning liberals were on.

The overall objective in the new global order is to move aside and let the younger generation take over. When the younger generation is going to make moves that would have allowed the Arabs to take controlling shares in Israel's largest bank, to invest billions into Gaza, well that's a monopoly gone way to far in my opinion. Instead of some haphazard aero gliders sliding on into Israel it would be a whole new ballgame in play. I just don't see Netanyahu waving around that kind of trust.