One thing you missed evidently was watching O'Keefe on Steve Bannon's war room where he tells Bannon that Pfizer is running around trying to find the source of the leak. This guy is getting more than his fifteen minutes of fame so how exactly is it they can't find him? Another thing you missed was there really is a Worldwide Research and Development firm in NY that works like a temporary employment agency for the tech hub scientific community. How can about looking into that was coming across a screen shot that someone posted in another video they did on the story. They searched his name and it came up among a set of pictures of different people and he was one of them. They all had technical names attached to them like this women named Nina So on the site, listed under Director, WRDM Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning. She, like all the rest at the bottom it had WW Research and Development. That seemed to indicate they all worked for WW Research and Development. In trying to search for WW Research and Development I found Nina So again but she had applied for and had gotten a job at Pfizer, it was listed no longer worked at WWRD. It's completely in the realm of possibilities that when he said at the end of the video he was a contractor that he was telling the truth. People embellish themselves all the time on a date. Also on the Bannon video O'Keefe gives himself completely away when he said the he worked under Sarah Wu after telling the whole world that this guy ran that department, which than Tucker Carlson grabbed onto and told the whole world that this guy was third in line at Pfizer, no that was Sarah Wu evidently because in the video the date asked him: So did that -did the whole virus mutation thing come from your executive Sarah (Wu)? He replied no, that came from - we have like chief scientific officers in the other divisions. The reason Newsweek, because I also read that the other day, said it was unverified is because the question of mutating viruses in a lab at pfizer does happen, so you can't claim it's false but you can claim it's unverified in the nature of what is actually going on it the lab. Even this guy in the video couldn't tell you exactly what's going on. In some brainstorming session he sat in on he could tell you what was discussed, mutating a virus he said they tabled that idea. From what he could glean from discussions or office gossip because he doesn't really elaborate where he got it from he heard about directed evolution. Yes Pfizer, because I read it in a yahoo article that I clicked upon a link in that article trying to see what it was they were doing to find a universal once a year covid vaccine and it discussed on they had used directed evolution to find a universal influenza vaccine, the difficulties involved because there are different types of families to influenza's, etc., but it taking a similar part of those viruses found in both families and finding a way to inoculate against them. It wasn't gain of function because they weren't trying to gain anything, they weren't trying to enhance the virus. They are up for regulatory review this year to see if they can get approval. Not that anyone I know going to take it, we've all lost trust that way. So I am assuming if they get approval they'll do the same with covid and it's variants. Sounds to me like they were after Sarah and the best they could do was this guy who may have worked under her. He tried to tell them what it was they were planning but they wanted an open admission they were making the variants in the lab that are spreading everywhere, when they didn't get that out of him the way they wanted they ran with what they got and misconstrued it to make it look the way they wanted. This is driven desperation, no one can blame them because it's been into the third year now and people are tired of not having answers but destroying some saps life over it isn't the answer either. But they know people will fall for it but they also know it'll further drive a wage between people to be used to keep dividing both sides. It won't hurt Pfizer one bit but it will hurt the right as they get called low IQ conspiracy theorist and the left when they get called perverted. They should have thrown this one in the trash than embarrass themselves this way but they don't care, the objective is paint groups in a certain manner, with an overall brush because those who grant them the opportunity, the elites, whom they operate under want it that way. They all have an objective and it isn't finding out the real answers to what's going on, hypothetical hype instead of factual based evidence is what they'll keep us distracted with while they keep enriching themselves off their investment in the vaccines that are harming and killing people. They don't care who they have to bring to their knees in that objective.