Speaking of that Mike Itkis and the possibility he's working with people behind Nadlers campaign is an interesting take and could quite possibly be true but in some of these runs with Trump backed candidates it almost seems like they are trying to design them for failure. I started thinking about that after having read an article where the Dixon campaign here there was talk that the republican party isn't supplying her enough money for her campaign. An angle that was interesting in that regard was her run was put together by Betsy DeVos and Trump after having negotiated grounds together to back her. There was talk that Trump said if she didn't have enough to run her campaign than she isn't doing enough to bring in the money, as in the type of antics you see with Marjorie Taylor Green and Lauren Boebert who was recently accused of caring more about creating antics than representing people. Meaning rush out and say crazy stuff to create publicity. I'll be getting to something here now, well I thought it was really suspicious that the two most popular male candidates were kicked off the ballot because out of state petitioners had fraudulent signatures found on their petitions to run. I guess this happened a lot across the country but no one seems interested in finding out who these petitioners are and who is backing them. Anyway, abortion becomes the hot topic of debate all of a sudden because of the SC ruling, something that would be better seen addressed by woman than man, that's why I think they wanted the guys out of the picture....but Dixon is overly extreme, she just doesn't believe that woman shouldn't get an abortion under any circumstances at all but also that woman shouldn't be allowed to have contraceptives. So she's a nutcase basically. Not that I won't vote for her because she doesn't stand a chance in hell of taking contraceptives away from woman but a couple weeks back I am sitting listening to a show and an ad comes on for John Gibbs, another Trump backed candidate. I guess he's even more extreme than Dixon having said or written in the past that woman shouldn't be allowed to vote or be in politics plus all the anti abortions stances. So I was like that's strange, sounds a lot like Dixon. But it didn't stop there, a few days later I am watching a news show and they start talking about Matthew DePerno, another Trump back candidates who's running for attorney general and he also has the same extreme views but he also gained his notoriety taking a case here of election fraud in a remote county in the U.P. The thing about DePerno is he was out before the SC overruled Roe vs Wade campaigning on the stance that no abortions be allowed period. I am thinking to myself how exactly is it that three people with very extreme almost prehistoric views gets backed by Trump. It's like they were planning a loss because face it in todays world nobodies going back to basically woman running around barefoot and pregnant. It's also funny how the two top candidates got bumped off the ballot. I am totally against late term abortions, ban on abortions for rape and incest but I am also of the mindset woman should have a right to make their own decisions but those decisions should be made in a timely manner. Late term abortions are outright murder in my opinion. But to me this whole thing seems contrived. Set up. With them opting not to financially stand behind Dixon after having made the commitment to is also odd. She started gaining steam in the last couple weeks after saying she'd respect the right of voters to chose on abortion but still she has basically been left out in the cold because she refuses to act like an idiot saying idiotic things to fund her campaign. Well almost, she was on Tucker tonight and she was trying to make a point that all democrats do is create families of single parent homes, which she didn't describe as making it harder on woman financially, and that woman who have to work have less time with their families, she comes out and says that single woman are lonely woman. That's a lonely lifestyle she said. Well I'll tell you, I was a single parent and you are never lonely when you have kids, you are way to busy to think about being lonely because they fill every gap of your life. If you are lonely for some adult company that is easily solved by finding a sitter who'll take them over night or a guy who has his own place. Once you are revigorated in that manner you wake up feeling refreshed and move on with your children who keep you to busy to be lonely. I bet right about now she spends less time with her kids than I ever did working ten, twelve hours a day so she's taken what had kept her from feeling lonely and abandon it for a life in politics. Now she thinks she's entitled to tell us all how lonely we must all be or had been. She's a nutcase, they are all nutcases trying to prescribe how we should be leading our lives. That doesn't work today, there's to many variables and they know it, the June Clever days are over and I hardly doubt she'll ever be sponsoring legislation where a one person working family that enables mom to stay home will ever be introduced. So they mapped this out to be stuck between a choice of two extremes. A governor who'd allow the complete utter murder of full term babies or a governor who wants to take you back sixty years ago. From Michigan's perspective I just get the feeling it's almost like they've designed it to swing towards democrats. Like SC justice Breyer, I think it was him who said it, life would be so much better if we found ways to go out and around each other than to rely on the court to make every decision for us. Part of that is coming to compromise on the issues most involved today. Can't find a baker to bake you a cake because you are planning a gay wedding than find another baker, you don't want children having undue sexually explicit stuff or the LGBTQ stuff taught to them than compromise things like that to upper grades of education, where basically it belongs. Kids are to busy being kids whereas in the junior levels they are more developing their feelings sexually. Come to grips with a reasonable amount of time for woman to have an abortion, we are not God and it's not our right to judge but outright murder should stop. I've had serious doubt about Trump, as you probably noticed, when he brought the owners of J&J to his rally in PA knowing full well his base isn't kosher to the vaccines it's almost like he was trying to sabotage Oz's campaign. I think the same thing here, it's like he's trying to sabotage the election here by backing nutcases. I don't know if he's backing the guy you are talking about but I surely wouldn't be surprised if he was. Like the Hershel Walker stuff, he says we'll see how it plays out before I decide any different on my backing of him. Uh, no, Georgia is crucial just like Michigan, there's nothing worse than anything Trump's ever done in his past that allows him to sit in judgement of Hershel. I've been trying to tell people Trump's a trojan horse but they can't see beyond all the hype he creates, nor the fact that he knows that hype has proven profitable.