I think it's going to go along the lines of what Dr Richard Fleming was saying, that is finding out to what extent the vaccines had an impact on people. How much of the vaccine does it take to do what level of harm(s).

Realistically you couldn't have a vaccine that would have people falling over dead spontaneously, that'd been to big a give away to fast. It had to be a planned slow progression into illness than death unless people were compromised, or like they say, vulnerable, that vulnerability gives them an out to blame it on something else, which they did.

I think with the war between Ukraine and Russia was a pre-staged event. It pretty much aligned with the first reports out of the UK of the above average people dying among the vaccinated. I think that was meant as their turning point away from pushing mandates and into what would have become at that point and seems to be what is has become is a mainstreaming of the vaccines towards an annual shot similar to how they push flu shots among elderly and vulnerable populations. The vulnerable, for the most part are not economically viable to them and come at a huge tremendous cost to the system. The elderly are just a population of old school people they don't want anymore aligned alongside the fact that they also are a huge financial burden on the system. With the prospects of four retirees to every two workers by 2030 that burden is only going to get worse.

I also don't rule out a push towards requiring the shots for school but I don't think it will happen before the next presidential election but I also am of the opinion that they would actually wait until five, six years down the road to do it.

With that said that means Trump has to go because it's highly unlikely to happen under him, unless of course they find a way for him to blame it on something or someone else. If he makes it that far the thought of stealing another election is something they can get away with under him because it's now become expected for them to try everything, including stealing another election, to get rid of him. He would agree to such because he would sail off into the sunset making millions more off his supporters, and the ability to have those same supporters unwittingly, or unknowingly, install the new leaders who will replace those close to choosing retirement. It will sort of be like them choosing their own replacements.

Meanwhile in between all that it will get people distracted, keep people pinned against each other and I think as a result we will see an increase in violence over it.