The only basis I am aware of for this accusation is Malone stated who it was that attacked his medical license. Given that specific and singular event, I disagree with your implication that doxxing is a tactic Malone often employs.
That's not how it played out in the video I watched him in. He was openly advocating it was time to start fighting back. If I remember correctly his aim was toward the globalist players and said he'd furnish them with these individuals personal information.
Malone constantly 'talks shit' about the jabs, but as you can see from this post he is citing hard data and not talking out his ass.
Not on prime time television he is not. He may talk about the failure of mRNA technology but he is not allowed to bad mouth the jabs. He has spoke out against children being given these jabs. Even Dr McCullough is limited in what he can say about the vaccines. I was surprised to see him on Laura tonight given lead way to try and explain why it's the states with the highest vaccination rates seeing the highest covid cases. He could say the vaccines were waning in their ability to provide protection, something that has already pretty much been established because otherwise people wouldn't need more jabs. It was sort of a double speak conversation given cases are "supposedly not as severe" but that could have been just to save face with "whoever" it is behind the scenes that obviously must be a threat to anyone who outright claims the vaccines are a failure...that is never allowed to be said. So it was wishy washy between is it because it's a milder variant or the vaccines keeping from getting as ill.
Malone basically, as I said in my blog on it, stuck some peanut butter in some chocolate but never perfected it into a perfect peanut butter cup. Go ahead and spend some time going over these patents, yeah it's painstaking time consuming but you said you have some science back ground, see exactly who it was that found that the FE system using certain metal wires didn't cause the cells to explode, see who it was that got nanotubes successfully into the cells, see who it was that got those nanotube the ability to send back information of cellular activity and than you'll see Malone for the liar that he is because that man did not develop this mRNA technology being used or these vaccines.
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=19&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22%09Lieber%3B+Charles+M%22.INNM.&OS=IN/%22
Here's the thing. Malone is right that from the beginning they couldn't get it to last. That was a long time ago. Maybe he spent years more trying to do that which Liebers succeeded at but he failed. It wasn't just getting "whatever" into the cells to produce a positive result, which it does produce a positive result but it doesn't last, but also that it didn't destruct the cell or the cellular activities breaking through the cellular barrier.
If you go look at the blog I did on it it provides part of Malone's research and a link to it from at the beginning, it also provides a link to his patent, which has long expired. So you look at that than go over Liebers stuff, regardless if Liebers was involved or not you can certainly see the difference between the two so when he got called out on Laura's show for basically being a liar, actually was you are not the creator of the vaccines or technology, to which Malone said he begged to differ you will clearly conclude that Malone is lying. Than you can come back to me and tell me your conclusion on why someone would lie about such a thing.
RE: Child Sacrifice for Pharma Profits and the Power of Plutocrats