Two things kicked your Koch Postulates apart. One it was trotted by a nut case who doesn't realize she's went overboard in her demands and can't reason with the fact she's not qualified to access and be granted the footprint to a deadly virus. Two was the fact the Postulate was written in the late 1800's to early 1900's, a time when viruses had yet to be discovered. Now I could have spent all night clicking on the links within the article but ultimately I'd came to the same conclusion. What'd came of it would amount to me spending time wasted like Massey trying to prove something that is outdated in comparison to the technology of today. Been there done that with valued-customer (hoping God isn't resting his soul), another who likes to use outdated criteria to fit a narrative. I respect valued's opinions but that one just wasn't cutting the cake. No matter how much time one spends countering it and why it's a near impossibility to change their rationalization.
The reason deaths are unchanged in some area's compared to others are some people obviously were slanted to die in any given period of time....they just didn't die of what they were suppose to die of because the rona helped them get their faster. If they didn't die of their old age, heart disease, respiratory failure, etc., before the onset of getting rona then rona did them in, not old age, not heart disease, not respiratory failure, etc., what came first now came in a secondary cause of death because they were not healthy enough to fight it off.
At the beginning we didn't know healthier people could survive this, we also didn't know it would get politicalized. Yes the initial lockdown was more than likely the right thing to do. Thing is when things get used as a means to fit a political narrative it gets miscued. The fact that cases in the US have dropped sixty nine percent since the election is telling of that. The fact they came out after the election and said the PCR test cycling time was causing false positives is telling of that, they were spun like that to fit a narrative.....and they could have been spun into that falsity all summer long but that doesn't mean there still wouldn't have been cases that were legit given there was no prior historical established immunity or vaccination to have completely stopped viral spread, especially among those in confined places like nursing homes, a temperature controlled environment. That's an important factor contributed to why viruses dissipate during the summer months. A lot of it has to do with the boost in immunity from the sun and the amount of moisture in the air. When you think about the amount of deaths in nursing homes and so many blue state governors who were so willing to ship covid infected patience into them....where they died by the thousands, it sure would be a guaranteed way to keep the fear mongering going as it holds up your death counts.
Most people I assume are asking themselves how just is it that there could have been a sixty nine percent drop in cases in less than a couple months after an election is won by someone else?....it's definitely not because of vaccines. Most are waking up to how they got played but it does not mean the virus doesn't exist it means it got overplayed to fit a political narrative....at least at this point we'd better hope so because many states are opening back up. I guess now it comes down to this virus disappearing, if it does they most certainly will say it's because of immunity from vaccines as they progress, if it doesn't I'd seriously have to contemplate deliberate controlled releases of these mutated viruses to maintain political power. Something I mentioned in another comment somewhere...but we aren't quite there yet for that debate.