I can't help it that not only do you apparently have reading comprehension issues but hearing comprehension issues also, either that or you didn't watch the video at all. Do you not understand the concept of "eyes wide shut?". They've been doing this for quite some time, weigh count voting. Hillary was the pre-determined winner of the 2016 election. That's how they could propagandize it as such, the machines were set to weigh count a portion of votes from her opponents votes to make it so. The problem came when Trumps votes overwhelmed the algorithms pre-set on election night. Setting them any higher to ensure a pre-determined winner would have made it obvious as you can only weigh count so many votes away from opponents same day voters otherwise you end up with something similar to what happened in Antrim County Michigan when the whole of the town is known republican but the democrat wins. Hence the need to establish that which you cannot do through manipulating the machines algorithm wise through the use of finding reason for a wider distribution of mail in ballots. This can be found in the forensic examination of the voting machines in Antrim and Macelona Counties in Michigan. The examination found logs missing and that the locks on the machines had been compromised and the code within the machine was set to weigh count votes. The reason you don't know this is because the AG went to court on behalf of the SOS of Michigan to have the examination sealed, they were granted that but the judge only gave them a few days. They argued to keep the code sealed, their argument was that the code would compromise future elections. The judge granted them that much but the rest was released to the public. The forensic examiner released to the press that the reason they wanted to keep the code sealed was because that was the part that showed the weigh count voting. The SOS said that it was human error because the clerk didn't do an update....but here's the thing with that, a clerk does not have a right to do a software update once the machines arrive. Those machines are preset, sealed by two members of each party, those members then locked the door together of where the machines are kept until deliver, on the day of deliver they show up and unlock the door and travel together to deliver the machines where they are again locked inside a room until needed, both parties unlock that room and set them up in polling places. This would explain why the seals on the machines were broken, someone accessed them when they shouldn't have been, that would also explain why the logs are missing as to who accessed them. That's established court evidence, it has been introduced as evidence in a case, that's why the AG filed on behalf of the SOS to keep it sealed, there simply is no other reason than not wanting that evidence out there other side they wouldn't have felt compelled to argue against it, why?, if everything was up to par why would they argue against releasing the results? The SOS also said the mistake would have been caught by the tabulating tape. But in a signed affidavit presented before the Michigan commission on voter fraud the clerk said, "On the night of Nov 5 she got a call asking her to come in on Nov 6th and make a new tabulating tape", now I ask you why would they need a new tabulating tape if the first one accurately reflected the election results? This blew the commission backwards, they asked the guy "are you sure because we had the SOS in here yesterday and they told us the mistake would have been caught on the tabulating tape", the guy read them word for word what her affidavit said. They then replied they would have to recall the SOS to ask her what was up with that. You can watch the video as it's out on the internet, just google Michigan commission on voter fraud, pick the longest running one as many have been audited to show just portions of the hearing, which is hours long. Furthermore last week the same judge just ordered the SOS to hand over every communication she held with various people about the election.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/mi-judge-orders-dem-sec-state-release-communications-dominion-facebook-apple-amazon-google/

This isn't over by a long shot.

In this document just reading the part where Mark Zuckerburg gave millions of dollars to an organization who in order to receive funding from them for their elections the states had to sign contracts with them as to allow them to dictate to the states how that money could be spent which favored democratic controlled blue area states over their republican controlled areas. The mere fact they signed onto this is election fraud, only state legislatures can determine how elections are run.

https://got-freedom.org/evidence/

There's Mr Pulitzer's video I posted a couple weeks ago, it further goes on to detail how fraud was committed. This guy is no lightweight, he's quite a genius.

If you can't see the fraud it's because it's being kept from you and you fail to go find what's being discovered.