I basically upvoted him on this one because I felt that in this instance he had a point. He goes on vacation then comes back without evidently doing his due diligence on this one before deciding to link it directly to a long shot based upon his prior reporting on 5 g. There's been no evidence outside of his neighbors saying when asked if he had any problems when it came to 5g that a couple times they saw him on his roof adjusting the antenna. The only reason they asked that early on was because there had been attacks (mainly damage) to locations of known 5g towers in the state prior to the bombing. Thus far as it stands there's been no proof, no statements from the girlfriend and I am sure they asked her especially since they asked the neighbors, there is no social media accounts known on behalf of the bomber, no political affiliations he wasn't even a registered voter. Plus the fact that according to another article, if proven true, he decided to park in front of a data processing center and not directly in front of ATT or the ATT tower that would have hosted the 5g. So my conclusion is his call out of this is premature.