We going to roll over that again....crypto's have been determined to have value so people can proceed in court to sue when wronged. This just may be the big one that accelerates those behind blockchain technology that they aren't beyond the long arm of the law. Before it was just small fries filing complaints trying to make a pile big enough for someone to take notice....now they've done went up against someone much richer than them who could hire a lawyer and be in court in no time. At best their only legal option was to power down and leave steem and before making radical changes that could result in potential losses at best justinsuns options before doing so would be notification so they could remove their investment, and that's exactly what both parties would get told in a court of law. Justin has no right of determination over their stake without notice of change and they have no legal right over his to force him to tell what his plan of actions are. A judge would tell them he can do whatever he wants as long as there is sufficient notification to opt out. (I have no stake in this game but I will be trying to figure out how to unvote witnesses as I proxied them to some else whom I have no idea who they voted, all's I know is I don't want to end up in some legal hassle should that happen and be accused of being supportive of a illegal maneuver by supporting those who made the move.)