You are a dog faced pony liar, you never read shit from the only reliable source given on one of his links, if you had you'd come across this:

Nine patients with viral pneumonia and negative for common respiratory pathogens, who presented to at least three hospitals in Wuhan, were included in this study. Eight of the patients had visited the Huanan seafood market before the onset of illness, and one patient (WH04) did not visit the market but stayed in a hotel near the market between Dec 23 and Dec 27, 2019 (table). Five of the patients (WH19001, WH19002, WH19004, WH19008, and YS8011) had samples collected by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which were tested for 18 viruses and four bacteria using the RespiFinderSmart22 Kit (PathoFinder, Maastricht, Netherlands) on the LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR system (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Presence of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV was tested using a previously reported method.14 All five CDC samples were negative for all common respiratory pathogens screened for. Four of the patients (WH01, WH02, WH03, and WH04) had samples collected by BGI (Beijing, China), and were tested for five viruses and one bacterium using the RespiPathogen 6 Kit (Jiangsu Macro & Micro Test, Nantong, China) on the Applied Biosystems ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA). All four samples were negative for the targeted respiratory pathogens.

You know what that means or do I have to spell it out for you?....I'll spell it out anyway. That means the patients infected with COVID19 exhibited no SARS or MERS in their bodies....which means not naturally or not from a vaccination as they would have found the antibodies.

The articles goes on a quite lengthy, all thanks to you I had to spend my time reading and deciphering it all, to explain all the what seems like zillions, or at least to me seemed as such or might have well said, of test run against every known virus ever put in the data bases, again thank you very much, (/s), only to come to the conclusion at the end that this virus does originate from bats where the virus has mutated, then when to infect another source, which at the time they hadn't figured out but now we know it's some frickin' ant eater. What this guy did was cherry pick exerts from the article while REAL scientist were trying to rule out what it wasn't with what it was...but that still had that "third host" gap at that time. Then the nut case takes some shit from over a decade old and starts fear mongering about a vaccine when all it ever said was, and I am sure during a lot of medical studies with mice many studies with them prove regardless of what they are studying, ....we do not recommend you do this and here is the reason why. So they scratch that off the drawing board. The plain fact that they found absolutely no SARS or MERS in these nine patients pretty much confirms he hasn't the slightest idea what he's talking about.

What the scientist are the most worried about is whats driving the rapid speed of transmission....(at the time they wrote that article) what mutated in the two different bat viruses closely aligned, what was the missing link (ant eater?) and what role could it play to host out a whole new faster spreading virus?

In conclusion, we have described the genomic structure of a seventh human coronavirus that can cause severe pneumonia and have shed light on its origin and receptor-binding properties. More generally, the disease outbreak linked to 2019-nCoV again highlights the hidden virus reservoir in wild animals and their potential to occasionally spill over into human populations.

Now with that said if what he was saying held any truth no one would be a survivor as anyone who got any claimed vaccine would all die. There has also been deaths outside of China and, you were slow on the uptake of this one, they never got a vaccine from China and they also died from pneumonia. Plus Ralph ordering a mandatory vaccine regiment does not mean they meant for a specific vaccine or new vaccine. Granted I did not go look to see if China had a mandatory child vaccine schedule like the US but maybe they didn't and they implemented one, or maybe they, like in many other places there are a growing number of people not getting them and now they want them to know it's absolutely required. I mean really, think about what this guy is saying, which is that despite the evidence China went ahead and forced people to get a vaccine based on poor scientific research that showed that a particular vaccines for the SARS virus when confronted with any other number of virus a person could catch would cause death within a matter of days. Really Ralph? One of the most slave labor driven economic machines in the world and their going to force a vaccine on their slaves based on science that says: Don't do that or else.

I watched a program today I recorded after seeing a commercial that they were going to interview a US Senator on what was going on with China and the virus. Sen. Tom Cotton said that so far China has refused all help from the US, up to and including sending the CDC Specialist over there. He has a greater concern because from what he said was he does not believe the virus originated at the sea food market and that the virus was brought there, he didn't mean deliberately but he had concerns in regards to the bio lab down the road, that concern arises more out of the fact they've refused help and as to why. He said they don't have all the answers yet when it comes to this virus and how it manages to spread so quickly or why it's so contagious. Again though it's all speculative because of the "unknowns". If you go by what the scientist said in the Lancet article there is one known, that is of the nine patients none of them tested positive for SARS or MERS, which I am gathering would give Sen. Cotton more pause as it may have serious consequences as this may or could have the potential to be involved in bio weaponry. Again, this is all speculative, but the take away from it all is this: If the best in the industry doesn't know all that we are dealing with I am sure this nut case anti vaxer hasn't the slightest idea what he's talking about at this juncture.