Illegal proof reversal is pretty much saying what I read and say versa what you read and say is right. Anybody can play games like that but ultimately it isn't going to resolve the issue as much as continue the debate.

There is so much that we don't know, much that will never be published in fact. From what we know we can speculate but the best speculators are those who take the time to know the players, what the players have been involved in, what's been going on in any country/countries internally. From listening to the political players combined with what the populace has been saying you pretty much don't even up believing all that you are being fed as so much as learning to read between the lines of what you are reading.

From a position of that my conclusion is that it couldn't have just been a happenstance that these two men, Soleimani and al-Muhandis happen to meet their fate on the same day in the same location without full cooperation and awareness from some within the US, Iraq, and Iran. The mastermind and the financial mastermind of operations in clandestine operations across the middle east? Nope, that blunder would have never been allowed to happen in such an unstable environment such as Iraq. Somewhere within these countries, possibly even more, there was a consensus (somewhere) among somebodies that these two had grown uncontrollable and had to be taken out. al-Muhandis rarely made public appearances so it's really hard to believe he drove on out to the airport to pick up his buddy. But this isn't the kind of stuff you care going to read in the papers, this is the kind of stuff you have to paste together on your own.