Excuse me that instead of his video presenting him in his studio or some other logo that would indicate it wasn't part of the news report....as that's what I thought it was with the picture of the house on it. That's the standard fair when you see a video posted with the article, especially if that video appears with something to do with the article on it. It really doesn't matter as in the manner he has set it up makes it appear as his original content, especially when he doesn't link to the article specifically just the website the article came from.

I know what you are trying to say and it makes a whole lot of sense since what's in the news is generally the subject matter of his talk show but he has to make some changes to his format that specifically puts the focus on the fact that the article is drawn out from local daily news events which will be the basis and relevant to my show today then put the actual link up. I don't know if that will help as he displays the whole article and that is often fawned upon here. People who do news blog stories are often left alone if they only put in exerts from the article while writing about the article also...in this case it's a bit different because he doesn't write about it he does a video on it. It really isn't going to help him much here if he doesn't understand or wants to change his format style to distinguish the difference. The fact he isn't being sued doesn't mean a thing, I can copy and paste all day long on many blogs...each blog has different rules, some allow you to post the whole article, others just segments of the article or in the case here exerts in between written content. In the end it's his choice. He really should though be the one up front and center on his own videos.