RE: RE: Downvote "Gangs" of NewSteem aka Flag Man Bad: Answering Common Objections + SFR Abuse Definitions Update
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvote "Gangs" of NewSteem aka Flag Man Bad: Answering Common Objections + SFR Abuse Definitions Update

sunlit7(64)
Published in
#flag
Words
742
Reading
4 min
Listen
Play
7y

If they start producing shoddy birdhouses that are falling apart and customers start complaining, your supervisor may push to have their pay docked as a stipulation of their employment.

You know how retarded that sounded?....an employee is making shabby products and you are only going to dock their pay? One: the only pay you can dock is if they were making piece rate, which is anything over their day rate. Day rate at the lowest end of the pay spectrum would be minimum wage. People earn higher day rates through wage increases. If an employee's time study rate on a job says they can make say three birdhouses in an hour then the employee to get a piece rate bonus would have to make over three bird houses in a hour, only if those over the three can be docked as federal/state laws mandate an hourly wage. Two: The only other viable way to not pay someone for making birdhouses is if that person was self contracted not an actual employee. Three: Your only option left would be to fire someone who repeatedly made crappy birdhouses all day. Four: Deduction from piece rate can only be for those pieces at hand, an employer can't say: I am taking everything from you this last six days even though you did good on those days I am just really pissed at your for screwing up today. This isn't some third world country where people can't abide by federal/state mandated laws. In case inquiring minds want to know every single form of monetary compensation is protected under federal law. You are not allowed to take it away for retaliatory reasons. So when someone gets mad over a post and downvotes it then runs over and downvotes everything that person did in a seven day period....that is retaliation.

Copy/paste

Copying material without adding significant original content regardless of attribution to original creators.
A post with minimal original content is copy/paste. A screenshot with few lines >of text is also copy/paste.

This is exactly what the soldier account is doing as there is no verification that any of these girls she is promoting has signed up for a Steemit account. She is posting their materials and everyone is just suppose to take it that she has their permission.

Identity theft/deception
Pretending to be someone they are not. Posting content from another source, claiming to be that source when they are not.

It can be any entity: a company, person, etc.
All content produced will be flagged regardless of originality with ‘identity theft’ being the prime reason.
Plagiarism
The act of copying or stealing someone else’s words, ideas, content and passing them off as your own work. Posting content that is not yours without verified permission from the original content creators.This includes rewriting articles to circumvent plagiarism tools, which is known as "spinning" articles.

Simple case: copy and paste material without citation
Moderate case: copy bits and pieces of content from multiple sources
Complex case: rewording and spinning the content from one or even multiple sources
Percentages of Plagiarism
Articles: review case by case
Poetry/images: none tolerated
Edited images are only acceptable if cited and/or part of an “artistic process” post
DTube/DLive/DSound: must cite author or zero tolerance
Please consider the following additional action(s):
Contact vote sellers and curators to have them remove votes and/or blacklist the offenders
If you are not comfortable of doing so, please contact an admin or moderator to do this

I'd say the soldier account falls within a lot of these as it is SHE who is claiming the rewards for these picture post. Again, provide verification that these women have Steemit accounts and she has their sole permission to post their content and gain the curation rewards.

It's a bit two faced to say that someone on your team is backing someone(s) who supports this while simultaneously saying those person(s) whom the person on your team is buddies are what is stopping
you from flagging this activity.

Furthermore steamcleaners coming out and saying "solider is the face of APPICS" is not a reason to excuse abuse.

This includes faucet delegation vote farms, collusive voting farms and other large groups/network that are voting on spam-type content. This content can be automatically generated by bots posting pictures/videos from the web.

This is another form that may actually be going on here as I have stated already there has been no verification of these accounts.