Sounds quite a bit like what Trump was addressing to the American people the other day when he told them something along the lines of "these are people whom you work alongside to help then to find they stabbed one of your son's or daughter's in the back" when addressing the outcry over Syria.

The shear brutality involved here is something that goes over many people's heads. Often over minute religious differences in doctrine. Something that use to escapes most as they are beyond the rationalization how some could behave in such a manner as it is normal for them to live in a larger extent in peace among each other without regard to beliefs held.

That all changed after Iraq by events that proceeded in the years afterward. Though it would be unfathomable to think that Bush wasn't aware of the many bees in that hornets nest everyday ordinary people weren't. Many were sold for eons (blinded by faith) this was simply based on the fact that the Muslim religion wasn't compatible with the Christian faith, thus most viewed is solely as religious prosecution of Christians. That ended up being the biggest understatement sold to mankind. This wasn't just an "us" against "them", this was them against each other, and in particular when they weren't focus on just us. To the extent it went on just blew people's minds for such a modern society.

For those who took the time to understand it better they were able to try and comprehend a broader perspective(s) on the issues involved.

These decisions made in unilateral force among nations may not have always been based on the profitability to be made by outside forces but the profitability that could be made by the inside forces and the cause and effects moving forth thereafter as it pertained to the safety and well being of society as a whole.

Once you can get to that point the term warmongering, though not totally taken out of the equation, it loses a lot of regard in that respect. In quite a few instances the word war can be dropped with mongering intent on meaning the overall well being of society.

In this new realm of reality unfortunately, though not surprising, rose the sympathetic effect. Whereas people in their good nature thought the answer lied with removing those in harms way with opening arms. They never stopped to think why it took a brutal dictator to keep them all in line and now they are finding out....albeit, the hard way.

This has led many to want to give the words brutal dictatorship a more enchanting undertone. A much more preferable, desirable affect than the one they currently find themselves in. That, mind you, would come as no surprise. Yet many does not equate to all therefore the quandary of it all still languish.

As such I think to mix up a bit of my own alphabet soup. It taste even better when a president thinks it taste pretty good also. When leader A says to leader B I've had enough of this bullshit, leader B knowing full well when leader A says he's tired of something he means it he then tells leader C sorry you couldn't keep leader D in line so see yeah, that's my kind of leader. Then when leader A checks leaders C & D I love it even more when leader B put leader A back into check. Everyone knowing their place and boundaries solves issues. It gets even better when leader B says to leader R you take that part and see what you can come of it and we'll take this part and see we can come of it and maybe...just maybe somewhere down the road this will work as so far nothing else has.