if you mean superior by invading other countries i agree

Most interventions have been based on potential threats, whether real or perceived. If every country capable in the ME had the potential to gain nuclear weapons, with some given their own behavior(s) towards each other as an example would you feel this world a safer place? If not us intervene in these potentialities then who as there will always be a who when it comes to man as greed knows no boundaries and mankind can't be trusted, that's just how the game rolls. If left unchecked Russia and China through all the decades involved here wouldn't work in conjunction for the safety and well being of the world they'd owned it, more than likely even us by now. Reflecting upon that should show you the choices you'd been afford to live your life dependent the outcome of the winner. Most want to assume this is all about greed but not always does greed come into play when it comes to the well being of the world as a whole. Greed will raise it's ugly head the most for those void of the resources, something the US has not lacked when it comes to oil. Despite the appearance most want to assign it as greed when it comes to the US the underlying proposition is those countries with valuable commodities will not align themselves alongside those securing world well being if that measure meant they could never sell their oil. That is just simple logic. A market must be secured for the distribution of their commodity. One reason a country rich in oil would even entertain the thought of needing to distribute foreign oil into their own country would be on the behalf of world safety, security and securing the right of individuals to choose to live as they please.

I will entertain your thoughts on the current DC circus if I don't see some arrest warrants coming forth in the coming months based upon this deep state collusion.