I sort of thought the same thing but from something I read last night that apparently may not be true. Someone mentioned on another post that the more users the less in the pockets of the upper tier. With price so low one way to make up for it is to get rid of the lower tier users. That would seem to be the only real logical explanation for hardfolking to make it difficult for the lower tier to even continue or get a foothold. It seems to be playing out exactly like whatsup was advocating a few months back, they had to form groups to stick together to save each other...but you'd still have the stragglers hanging on your back so how do you deal with thousands of pesky no value people?....you find a way to get rid of them. It doesn't appear to be an instance of trying to expand the platform while the market is down this sort of looks like circling the wagons to save their investment.
I will admit though, and was quite surprised after I went to look myself, that mysearchisover was reaping in a lot more than I realized on such short post. I guess I was viewing the majority of his stuff before he was using a bot. I never thought to go see what the following days were like. Still before the hardfolk I guess you could say he was the least of their worries but afterward considering the contents of his post I guess no one should be shocked they'd eventually say something. The majority of the stuff I upvoted while joking around with him was less than a buck, maybe two, some of that same stuff made between ten and twenty bucks later....it was surprising. Just to be honest I don't think that even I could have agreed with that if I had known. What are you going to say to yourself really?....ask yourself how you can excuse one behavior but not another?...two wrongs don't justifiably make a right.
RE: Steemleader - Abuse - Stats - .140790/23/638