RE: RE: Men = Guilty? - Duluth Model - 554
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Men = Guilty? - Duluth Model - 554

sunlit7(64)
Published in
#sexism
Words
858
Reading
4 min
7y

Somehow I just knew you were going to make me go suffer through the last five minutes of that video. Usually I find myself telling someone they must have a reading comprehension issue, this time though it's a listening one. (not to mention observing) He opens his video in a laid back fashion to try and convey himself as a friendly, peace loving (shalom)...as if to say, "why look at me do I look like I could cause anybody trouble" type fellow, with a high emphasis portrayed on his Aussie accent, a look at me I am just an old bloke from Australia, a good guy like most blokes. This is important because he wants to instill in you a reason to like him, take him seriously, trust him, he's just a poor old soul whose been misrepresented but what he goes on to say doesn't hold any weight. He claims his mother moved in with him, knowing that he's going to basically bash woman he excuses letting a woman live with him under the guise of you can trust your mother, mom sets the alarm off and the security company can't reach him because he turned his phone off so his social media accounts can't disrupt him while he sleeps, if they call twice and there's no answer they come out. When they get there they immediately just assume you beat your wife, start asking him what's his name, phone number, what's that room over there, etc. Okay, let's just go over that for a moment. One the chances that the alarm went off accidentally is slim, no cops or security company is going to come charging into your house without some sort of distress call. Two no cops or security company are just going to jump to the conclusion that your alarm went off because you obviously must be beating your wife. Three it would be natural for cops or a security company to start asking you what your name is, etc., and asking what a certain room in the house is to see if you know as to confirm they are talking to someone who lives there not someone robbing the place...not because they think you have someone hidden there beaten up. The chances are really good that he moved in with his mother and accidentally set off the alarm and/or that is his wife's residence and he set off the alarm breaking in and she put in a distress call, I base that on the pieces of information given which he actually leaves you reading between the lines to fill in because how he lays it out going down doesn't make any sense. That's shown right off the bat by his accusation they just busted in, unless a distress call goes out that just doesn't happen, cops and security companies must believe there is a immediate danger or risk of harm to go into a home without a warrant. Also no cop or security company is going to blow off a call just because the first person they encounter tells them it's cool it's just a false alarm...most burglar's wish it could be that easy. My bet is that it is the marriage household or his mom's household where his wife may have been staying with her after a separation but considering that by the end of the video he's complaining about how you can lose your house and everything you own my money's on he broke into the marital home after a separation and he didn't like the fact he no longer had control and could be so easily removed by forces that he couldn't beat into submission. I guess the most damning evidence against him in this entire video is when he states he could move to a middle eastern country where "traditional" ways are still held in high regard exist...meaning this would never happen in a country where a man's home is his castle and whatever he decides to do within it's confines, up to and including beating the shit out of your old lady, is still lawful and a right. He never claims in the video he went to jail what he's complaining about is the fact that they take her word over his and he gets put out over it. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and say there was no abuse involved...that would mean that for whatever other reason the marriage has failed, obviously he's complaining about paying child support so there's kids involved, so knowing his marriage has failed what kind of man would kick his kids to the curb because essentially him claiming about having to be the one to exit he'd preferred it to be the other way around as long as he still had to provide to help maintain the household for his family until things were settled in a divorce he felt he not his children should have come first. The most amicable way through a divorce when kids are involved would be the least disruptive to the kids, a real man would do the right thing regardless of the circumstances.

@sunlit7: Somehow I just | Ecency