RE: RE: CPS in Florida snatches cancer-free child from parents, forcing him to undergo un-needed chemotherapy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: CPS in Florida snatches cancer-free child from parents, forcing him to undergo un-needed chemotherapy.

Words
687
Reading
4 min
7y

Well, well, well, we all know what those wells mean so lets get on with the facts.

Noah has acute lymphoblastic leukemia which is curable using chemo therapy, it has a proven track record.

The parents on the other hand didn't want him to go through chemo therapy and wanted to pursue cannabis and other herbal remedies which aren't proven.

A Florida judge ruled Wednesday that a 3-year-old diagnosed with >leukemia must continue chemotherapy treatment against the wishes of
his parents.

A Hillsborough County judge ruled that Noah McAdams must complete >the first phase of the prescribed chemotherapy treatment, but his parents may also concurrently pursue alternative treatments like >medicinal cannabis. (Credit: Hillsborough Co. Sheriffs Office)

Noah McAdams, who was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia >in April, was ordered by a Hillsborough County judge to complete at >least the first phase of a prescribed chemotherapy treatment.

His parents, Taylor Bland and Joshua McAdams, had asked the court to >allow them to forgo chemotherapy, in favor of alternative treatments, >including medicinal cannabis, vitamins and diet, according to CNN >affiliate WFLA.

The parents informed the doctor they wanted to seek a second opinion and pursue alternatives, after they failed to show up for treatment an endangered child alert went out to do a child welfare check. I've explained this to you before that it is the law that any case involving a child facing harm or death a doctor could lose his license for not notifying authorities. It went to court and they were ordered to do the chemo and the child could remain in the custody of the grandmother. The parents were granted unsupervised visits with their son.

The parents had previously informed doctors that they wanted to seek a >second opinion and pursue alternatives.

A dependency court judge ruled that Noah would remain in state >custody but could live with his maternal grandmother.

The parents then decided to remove the child from the grandmothers home and take him to Kentucky, they told the judge they did not know they couldn't remove the child from the state, said they were not going to deny their son treatment they just weren't happy with the hospital. The judge let them change hospitals, the child remained in the custody of the grandmother and the parents were also granted a right to use alternative methods along with chemo. The judge will determine as his treatments progress how many treatments he will have to continue to undergo according to the results of the test after each treatment.

The family was found in Kentucky that night and Noah was flown back to >Tampa the next day in the custody of child protective services.

Bland and McAdams said that they did not know they weren’t allowed to >leave the state. The said they were staying with family in Kentucky and >planning to visit a doctor in Cincinnati that week, according to Bland.

The parents had previously informed doctors that they wanted to seek a >second opinion and pursue alternatives.

A dependency court judge ruled that Noah would remain in state >custody but could live with his maternal grandmother.

The way this went down it's pretty clear the parents were lying and never had any intention of having their son treated with chemo and were seeking an exclusive herbal/cannabis treatment, otherwise they would have just said to the judge the first time they wanted to change hospitals and/or seek a second opinion at another hospital and from the looks of how this has went so far they'd been granted the right to go to another hospital as such happened after the child was returned. Obviously the second hospital confirmed the diagnosis so there was so far no known diagnosis of the child being cancer free, that was just more bogus lies on the parents part.

Whether you like it or not parents do not get to play god with another human life, that old adage I brought you into this world I will take you out is just that, an adage, it's meaningless and doesn't entitle parents the rights to deny you the right to survive.

@sunlit7: Well, well, well, | Ecency