I woke up with the idea to vote replies. Okay so it was a little voice. And these little voices are very cute because the less immortal side of my twin is also a sceptic, but they are becoming more and more insistent about any number of things. Inconveniently so? I would not know what convenience was anymore, I just appreciate all the help I can get.

On a less rambling note: I too shall be replying to votes, maybe even extremely so. (More on my extremism tomorrow).
If only because they are posts an sich. Take my sweet friend, the ever melancholic Persian Sina-adventure. He then gets a cent, on one of his off days, when he kindly makes the effort to communicate by way of a reply. I mean, lets face it, you need to be a hero to get through a post of mine (even skimmingly). That needs rewarding. Especially if you have Farsi for your first language. Excellent command of English anyway, and a relatively thorough reader (but the TEFL teacher feels so bad about all that gets lost in the nuance now I will not consider my potential larger audience as minimally multi-lingual and overdosed on cup-cakes, and therefore no longer let them cramp my style (okay, so I never was very big on the compromise) - I can feel in advance - how misconstrued I have to be in his ears. But he is valuable to me: a guy who hardly knows what he is doing here, but more to the point, he has brought here that he does not knowing what he is doing out there . An invaluable layer of truth.

The reply-voting seems to be important to my project. Or voting in general, for I don't feel like voting at all to anything that doesn't layer on. It's the most exhausting part of being here, and I almost admire the guys by the pool doing this for a living.

But how would that sit with the finer workings of the System. Sort of feeding into a very small pool. It's all peanuts, not even, but as above, so below, knock on effects and all that.... I watched the Big Short twice but must try again. All totally legit but defeating the main aim of generating more and more and more through the main idea of curating. Suppose one backtracked and replied, and that reply got upvoted, then the core premise of keeping the product (content) in motion is going to get another flavour. Hopefully a richer, deeper one. But I am not sure it can economically work and then I am not a Michael Burry (Christian Bale) and I lose my track of my thought about what I am really seeing, because I lack the knowledge of how things work. This is why I have to keep on asking you dumb questions.

The delegation now explained, it is gift to the project (i.e. to all extents and purposes claiming full responsibility: me) . I was just writing about why I wasn't powering up, in a post for tomorrow...so we are on track with that one too. Thank you very much, it has given me a 0.001 cent presence!

I wiggle happily.