My response was not meant to be aggressive. I'm a very sensitive person and your comments often are so ... punching right in the face, even without knowing much about the other side of the story. For your style of wording there is a different style of reply required, I think.

Steempeak did put in a proposal, yes.. and they seem to not only not feel entitled to funding (stating updates will happen either way), but also understand that funding is not guaranteed and stated even “we acknowledge that we will be funded at some points and not at others, and are ok with that.”

Let's be real. It would be way better for SteemPeak (and all of us) to get always funded by the SPS. With or without details about updates, many people do like and use the platform regularly and that's enough imo. We should not be focused too much on every single detail, when the overall mission is a good one.

Odd to try to focus on me being negative just because I am critical. I guess I missed all that positivity in your guilt trip of a post.

Yes, you are critical and that's not a bad thing, but you should try to be more empathic in your wording.