You see in me short-sightedness? I'm the guy who calls out the author on the fact that quantity is not the solution and creates an inferior product, not only that but creates additional problems like groundwater contamination and long-term health issues!!! You say my way of thinking is the problem? I'm the guy that raises organic food in his backyard using soil amendments and not chemicals. I'm the guy that's composting his waste to use in the garden. I'm the one looking at inflation from a REAL standpoint from facts because quality food that is healthy is becoming more and more expensive. I think you're mistaken here on who really cares. It's easy to defend a point when you refuse to accept statistics and facts, under that pretense I can prove that the world is spinning backward because any science that is used to argue against me is politically tainted and motivated. My attitude was a factual statement, he is arguing he is right, I'm defending my viewpoint, the point was neither of us will be alive when the time comes that will prove which is right. At least I had links to some real data supporting my standing which is more than the author had. The think ahead generation isn't as smart as they think they are either, the state of California in the United States and its population like to boast how green they are and how climate aware they are, and yet their highways and cities are littered horribly with garbage. They will go so far as to ban drinking straws and yet the San Joaquin valley flushes tons of fertilizer runoff into groundwater and streams that pose a threat to human, animal, and aquatic life. Everyone is big on the fact that we farm more food now than we ever have without taking into consideration the expense not only to the consumer but to the food chain itself. Bees are being affected at an alarming rate by chemicals used in farming and genetically engineered crops. How much food will they produce when the bees are gone? So please explain to me again how I and the way I think am the problem!?