Mate, you're not exactly helping your case. If you want to convince me (or JT) of anything, you could at least provide links to your past posts (so I don't spend over an hour scrolling) in which you summarise the problems with Relativity, or explain the advantages to the Electric Universe model. Don't send your intervocateurs on a wild goose chase, be prepared to give an answer. Write up a FAQ-style document and copy-paste responses if you must.

Furthermore, you don't help your case by stating well-established science is "silly." Wave-particle duality is directly observable, so if you think that it's incompatible with the existence of luminiferous aether, please explain why. Please explain, for example, the photoelectric effect.

As for the "obvious rebuttal": don't try flexing your credentials on me. That's a logical fallacy called an argument from authority, and in any event, I'm more of an authority than you; I started out as a chemistry major before switching to engineering, and I personally know four PhD-holders in the hard sciences (one of whom is my father, which is relevant because I was homeschooled). You could try saying that I'm just "more thoroughly brainwashed" than you were, but are you sure you want to go down that route?