Not really! Some of us actually have a life outside of Steemit.

@themarkymark I think there is a very big difference in using a relatively common name (StarWorld) which has been used in several different places for completely unrelated purposes, such as a TV station,

Of course not! That's the whole point! When the second amendment was originally drafted, none of today's deadly weapons were available, or even comprehended. And that same argument can be used to justify

Perhaps so, but they sure did not carry those canons around with them, nor did they qualify as concealed weapons.

"Are you against the second amendment?" No, I am not totally against the second amendment! What I am against however is the fact that there have been no changes to it since its original drafting,

Thank you very much for including me on your list. I am honored! And of course, thank you for the Steem. :)

"Star World, do you prefer a democracy or a republic?" A combination of both! While I am certainly pro-democracy, there are instances where there must be a certain degree of control over those

MUTED!!!

"If you think using downvotes is fraud, you need to get off a social platform of any sort quickly. I can only imagine how you must feel when someone doesn't agree with you." First of all, there

It's there now!

"So we used to have the option from our page to go to “Feed” which is was the most recent posts from people we are subscribed to, but now that is missing.." I think you'll find that it's there

"Option to set language of your post. Why So you can hide posts from your feed that you simply don't understand." Excellent Idea! if nothing else, it would certainly cut down on the number of

"You know what you did." Yes, I objected to be fucked by Steemit's scumbag management and witnesses! But now I'll get at least some satisfaction in seeing Steemit go out of business (as least

"It seems that the benefits will be for Tron holders only." As well it should be! Steemit's management and Witnesses fucked up Steemit to the point that it nearly went bankrupt last year, and

"witnesses and that entire structure itself is merely ignored with changes being implemented" Witnesses should have no say whatsoever in what rules are implemented. When they do, they do so only

"And if high ranking witnesses are taking actions you disagree with, I advise you to remove your vote for them or campaign for yourself or other witnesses." Does that include using their steem

So let me get this straight! Being a scumbag that cheats other members out of their curator rewards like @themarkymark and his band of criminals do, is okay, but calling them out on it earns the label

"What will Steem Classic be worth if Steem is a Tron token?" Worthless!

"Still doesn't say much about what's going to happen concretely." Indeed! I think it's rather hard to lay out the aspects of a business plan, when there is no business plan. Steemit hasn't had

"And what about the community coming to a consensus regarding those potential changes?" Don't count on it. What management does will be done solely to benefit those at the top, not the rest of