the payments are supposed to at least most of the time be for part of costs to produce a product that brings in revenue like we did the first time and we got much more back i belive in that case. The DAO would be responsible for helping fund its proposals for changes it may want to make that would cost the company money if its a change the DAO wants done why would the company be responsible as a investor in both it would be like milking a cow and the company is the cow if the DAO didn't pay for some or all of what it wants.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Hire Steem Monsters Corp to Develop and Host Bitcoin Halving Promo and Pay with DEC