Only those of your "fweedom" zealots subscribing to Alex Jones style paranoia would perceive the panel discussion above as some looney conspiracy gathering. Restricting false information designed to cause panic, during a time of a health crisis, is not "censorship of tyranny," but responsible and rational governance. Only those of your ilk, blind to the realities of circumstance by their fanatical devotion to "fweedom," would whine about government policies intended to minimise social harm. The panel does not even advocate restriction of blatantly ridiculous ideas - i.e. anti-vaxx - from public discourse, but discusses possible methods to overcome misinformation and fear-mongering of the anti-vaxx paranoia.

The spread of this epidemic has been limited to a few cities and isolated cases in a handful of countries because of the "tyrannical" measures by the CCP. I am sure your "fweedom" ilk would not be satisfied, unless the disease spread far and wide via unrestricted movement of people, but thankfully, rational minds prevailed in China. The riots in Hong Kong due to lack of government control in tempering social panic, while may be a paragon of social governance in the modern degenerate West, does not correlate to rational governance in most civilised societies.

Men need decisive leadership in times of crisis, or they degenerate into irrational beasts, as you can readily observe in Hong Kong. It is to the benefit of humanity that feckless mongrels and populist prostitutes, who only know how to parrot second-rate humanists, are not in positions of power in China at this time. Otherwise, this epidemic would have spread to all of Asia and beyond. The duty of rulers is to make hard choices that the peasant scum can not and will not.