RE: RE: Europe's Quid pro Quo
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Europe's Quid pro Quo

Words
194
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

The Yanks did fight a bloody war to determine which cultural factions dominate the nation. The landed gentry and agrarian South lost to the mercantile and financial urban culture of the North. In Africa, the most socially stable nation is Rwanda because one tribal faction made their competition irrelevant in the 1990s. Despite economic mismanagement, Zimbabwe remains relatively stable socially because of unquestionable dominance Mugabe's tribal faction exercises. Do you think centuries of tribal and ethnic differences, which has existed before the Europeans ever crawled out of their caves to dominate the ashes of civilisation left by the Mongol horde, will be resolved because of recent, forced arbitrary colonial amalgamation?

Just because the gutless European politicians bribe Morocco to perform their dirty deeds does not negate the ludicrous political and social demands generally placed upon African nations in exchange for financial assistance. Democracy is the one of the most pernicious ideas that Europe imposed upon Africa, along with conceptualisation of colonial administrative borders becoming "national" borders. And what is the EU solution for mass migration? Import all 1.2 billion souls living on the continent into Europe, in addition to 17 million souls in Syria?