The Norther African nations do not want uncontrolled mass migration into their nations, much like all sane governments in the world, unlike the EU, which has no government. It was NATO bombs that killed Gaddafi and destroyed the government in Tripoli, resulting in the chaos that currently reigns in that forsaken region. Even the warring factions in Libya can agree that uncontrolled mass migration into Libya will be unfavorable to the existence of a nation-state called Libya. The Northern African nations do not require foreign bribes to pursue policies of rational self-interest.

If the West had any far-reaching, rational foreign policy, they wouldn't be undermining stable regimes in Africa and the Middle East with cock and bull humanism, but rather support the stability of these regions by investments and aid unencumbered by demands of political "reform." It is the CCP money that will assist in stabilising sub-Saharan African states, thereby reducing the migration pattern northward from these areas. It is Russian military power that is restoring stability and order to the region of Syria by assisting legitimate government of President Assad. What is the EU policy, other than sending aid to malcontented rebel scum in Syria and refusing needed foreign loans to African states without ludicrous demands of political "reform?" By pursuing foreign policy of undermining "dictatorships" and promoting "democracy," the West harm themselves. Even recently, the West supported rioters in Hong Kong, which would necessitate the CCP to divert resources in suppressing internal dissent, at precisely the time Europe needs CCP money to prop-up failing African regimes to stem the uncontrolled migration northward.

I only wish the West would pursue some rational, longer-term foreign policy that would benefit Europe, instead of prostituting their culture and legacy chasing after nonsense idealism and financial interests that benefit only the few.