If you want to live like the stray rejects of a pack, then any one can choose to live in some abandoned, backwoods hole without any state protection, eking out subsistence-level livelihood without the need for some "revolution." I seem to recall some deluded libertarian fool who attempted to create his own state off the coast of Thailand; got himself killed for his "right" to exercise "sovereign individuality." There is no such thing as property without the sociopolitical infrastructure as provided by the state, or the crown, institution.

In nature, there exists only force and will. Beasts don't recognise property; they only recognise force, a condition towards which your libertarian lunacy will propel the remnant civilisation of the West. There is no such concept as "theft" in nature, for the strong take what they can and the weak suffer what they must. What you advocate is a collection of fragmented rejects waiting to be killed or enslaved by pirates and mafia. That the state provides protection and legal previleges to its subjects, so that prosperity can arise from order is lost to those blinded by their egotism. Everything the libertarians claim as their "property" and "rights" are built upon the previleges granted by their betters.

20th century humanist killings were direct results of malcontent revolutionary elements, convincing the muck to rebel against their betters, who have granted them their very lives. That these ungrateful muck, having bitten-off the very hands that fed them and protected them, died in mass numbers in famine and war is an illustration of divine punishment. Totalitarian hell is the consequence of freedom run amock, where men are "freed" from all obligations, duty, and restraint. The only good revolutionaries are the ones buried in unmarked mass graves.