The typical libertarian/anarchist argument against any policy regarding public security. By the above logic, societies ought not even have laws regarding murder, theft, rape, pollution, extortion, etc. since "bad actors" will likely not obey them either. For that matter, judicial institution will also be unnecessary, since the society will no longer have any laws to adjudicate. All social conflict will have to be resolved via violence and coersion by stronger "sovereign individuals" against weaker "sovereign individuals." The only "freedom" humanist malcontents offer for men is ways in which they can be exploited and killed.

A million rotting Syrian corpses bear mute witness to the humanist lunacy of "freedom" from law, order, and government. Tens of thousands of Colonials die each year as a sacrifice to the weapons "rights" religion, the tenets of which are essentially treasonous. Rebellion on demand is about which the gun fanatics in 'Murica prattle, as if a nation-state can exist within the chaos of such whimsical fancy.

Since you and your progeny owe no allegience to your sociocultural matrix, why even obey (oh no! The dreaded "o" word!) traffic laws? Why stop at red and proceed on green? Wouldn't drinking and driving must also be allowed to prevent any infringement on human rights? By your logic, the sober driver ought to be more fearful when driving.

Humanism and its tenents of "freedom" is the greastest threat to the continued survival of the human race.