The violence of the theocrats is an expected reaction to the West exporting democracy and humanist drivel around the world. Before the world can address the issue of human migration, it must deal with the issue of idealogy and cultural invasion. If all sociocultural matrices curtailed the export of their ideological bent, then the world would function with less conflict. As is currently, the West attempts to force its humanist religion on the Islamic world, the communists in China obtrude their philosophy unto the world using economic blackmail, Islam attempts to carve out a fiefdom in the middle of Europe, etc. If censorship of ideology detrimental to continuation of a sociocultural identity can not even be established, how can any polity even contemplate expulsion of incompatible people?
Control the free flow of information and cultural exchange and the problem of mass migration will end. If the humanist drivel had not subverted the existing sociocultural matrix of the Middle East, then the current sociopolitical collapse of many Islamic nations would not have been possible. Furthermore, the West continues its humanist religious proselytisation via covert operations (the "color" revolutions around the world) ensuring continued human mass migration from collapsing of sociocultural matrices. The current social destabilisation in Hong Kong by Western intelligence operatives, albeit with connivance of anti-Xi factions within the CCP, demonstrates continues Western/humanist war against the rest of the human race. The Islamic "terrorism" is but a defensive reaction against continued cultural assault by humanists in the West.
RE: What do you Think About Extreme Vetting?