much of it is often nullified by users like you

Look this is just wrong as a matter of how things work. Voting (down) doesn't "nullify" rewards, it allocates them between users. If one post is downvoted, others earn more. If one post is excessively upvoted, whether by ethusiastic supporters or, more often by autovotes or apathetic or oblivious votes, others earn less.

You can not make a compelling case in terms of growth that the rewards of many thousands of users who end up being somewhat larger as a result of reduced concentration of a few high paying posts isn't overall a good thing. You're just myopically focused on your own rewards and those a few others, and ignoring the bigger picture.