Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Login
Signup
smooth
@smooth
73
Followers
6106
Following
0
Follow
Email digest
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2016-03-25 13:36
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
smooth
newsteem
7y
RE: To all downvoters: @jrcornel is now on board with newsteem
Reasonable assessment.
$ 0.000
0
1
smooth
newsteem
7y
RE: To all downvoters: @jrcornel is now on board with newsteem
Why can’t we do what we want with our SP when it comes to votes? You certainly can, and others can downvote with theirs. Smooth is good for this blockchain in my opinion Am I good enough for the blockchain
$ 0.000
0
3
smooth
newsteem
7y
RE: To all downvoters: @jrcornel is now on board with newsteem
Let me see if I understand correctly. You upvoted yourself for 0.04 last week and were chastised and flagged for it?
smooth
newsteem
7y
RE: To all downvoters: @jrcornel is now on board with newsteem
You really think I voted that to "boost my own rewards" by 0.04?
smooth
newsteem
7y
RE: To all downvoters: @jrcornel is now on board with newsteem
numbers speak for themselves Unfortunately from what I can tell the numbers haven't really changed either way after the last hard fork. Continuation of the same downward trend on most metrics, which makes
smooth
newsteem
7y
RE: To all downvoters: @jrcornel is now on board with newsteem
Can someone or someones give me a clear definition of what exactly that entails Vote for what you think is good content that adds value to Steem by helping to promote it, helping to attract large amounts
smooth
steem
7y
RE: Steem experiment: Burn post #405
But, it's near impossible to trend now without bidbots. That can't be right. The same amount of content trends every day as before. What you are observing is that it is near impossible to trend on-demand,
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
How exactly will this prevent any hacking from the blockchain level? I'm not sure what you talking about. If you mean bugs in the blockchain code, lock ups don't prevent that either. They prevent people
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
I don't think the typical end user would see any difference other than the word "Staked" used instead of the word "Power". I'm not at all convinced one word is better than the other.
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
I think staking multiple pools, variable locking periods for security, etc. might be okay but I don't think they should be at the base layer. If we had even simple smart contracts like Bitcoin or perhaps
smooth
steem
7y
RE: Steem experiment: Burn post #405
Feel free to start your own daopost. If stakeholders want to vote for it there is nothing wrong with that. Personally I think the almost-1% annual budget for DAO (plus being partial or full beneficiary
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
Should we have staked STEEM instead of Steempower? What is the difference?
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
I feel we could reduce the voting time. Given all of the experiments we've done (12 hours, 24 hours, 30 days, 7 days), the one that seems to have worked the best is 24 hours. 7 days isn't nearly long enough
smooth
steem
7y
RE: Steem experiment: Burn post #405
Creating posts where people could vote to fund the DAO is a perfectly good idea, but it is a different one than this.
smooth
steem
7y
RE: Steem experiment: Burn post #407
I don't even know what spaminator is doing these days (and especially I have no knowledge of or influence over any "hitlist") so I removed the delegation. I may revisit the idea of burnpost helping
smooth
dblog
7y
RE: To Downvoters and my ex-followers, I'd like to continue my blog
There is no censorship, and you are not "prohibited from writing" whatsoever. You are also not guaranteed rewards. You may get rewards if a consensus of stakeholder voters think your content
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
I'm all for four weeks or even one week. I don't think it is demonstrated that these long lockups provide clear benefit at the system level. Yes there are benefits to an individual whose account gets hacked,
smooth
steemdao
7y
RE: HF Proposal: Vote to Reduce Power Down Period to 4 Weeks
Way too complicated IMO. Just not worth even close to that level of mechanism for something (lock up) that is very minor to the platform overall. If someone were building a system like Steem today it would
smooth
steem
7y
RE: STEEM and SBD burning statistics
Bring it on. BTW the above undercounts burnpost by about 25% since the top level burnposts (but not comments) currently use beneficiary to null and aren't included.
smooth
steem
7y
RE: STEEM and SBD burning statistics
before it is even created That's philosophically debatable. Payouts come from the reward fund and I believe that is considered part of total supply (though I'm not 100% sure on this last point).
← Latest
Older →
