smooth's comments - older posts | Ecency

DiscoverWavesCommunities

smooth

@smooth

73

Resource Credits

Available

Used

Created

2016-03-25 13:36

RSS Feed

Comments

Blog Posts Comments Communities Wallet

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

Hard no. The graph does NOT show the number of users, it shows the number of accounts which is not even close. It also includes Steemit in the whale section, which does not vote (at least not for the

$ 0.000

0

smooth

7y

RE: To Bid Bot Or Not To Bid Bot, That Is The Question

First of all, from the steem whitepaper it doesnt seem that by declining payout you "BURN" steem. It just remains in the reward pool You're right that got clarified/corrected in some of the comments.

$ 0.000

0

smooth

7y

RE: To Bid Bot Or Not To Bid Bot, That Is The Question

What Dan's proposing here is that Trending will become largely a paid-promotional area where the payment directly benefits the entire community. That's not a bad thing I doubt that it would because relatively

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

I also caution against heavy downvoting and reducing trending values drastically, people came to steem in their droves when trending posts were $1000 plus, with the hopium that they would get a fraction

smooth

7y

RE: Huge eSteem iOS 2.2 update now available to Apple users

Really? I've never heard bad things about it. What are your complaints?

smooth

7y

RE: To Bid Bot Or Not To Bid Bot, That Is The Question

Sure, something like that could be done as well.

smooth

7y

RE: To Bid Bot Or Not To Bid Bot, That Is The Question

I like your approach

smooth

7y

RE: To Bid Bot Or Not To Bid Bot, That Is The Question

Well said. Showing one post from the promoted section every 3-4 trending posts would work wonders.

smooth

7y

RE: To Bid Bot Or Not To Bid Bot, That Is The Question

It isn't literally burnt. I'm not sure if @theycallmedan was somewhat confused about this or using the term lossly, since the it was "burned" from the perspective of the poster doing the promotion

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

I 100% agree about one week not being long enough. I expect this process to play out over several months and I'm still not sure what the outcome will be. As for my votes, I had steadily delegated out (nearly)

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

My take is there is not much demand for the trending real estate, I've seen days go by without much new stuff on trending. If there were no demand then sincere and success-minded Steemians such as yourself

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

In practice there are only a few slots per day on the top of trending, maybe 5-10. Yeah everyone thinks their post is the best thing since sliced bread, but if other organic curators and stakeholders aren't

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

Don't agree with the "witch-hunting" name calling ;) Promoting is fine. But the amount of the reward pool used for doing so still matters. People can find ways and places to do so that don't

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

I disagree about eyeballs. You have followers who would upvote (including me) since yes it is a good initiative, and things have changed a lot on trending itself. The barrier to trending is a lot lower

smooth

7y

RE: Compact Broadcast Node: Low Cost Infrastructure to support Keychain, Splinterlands, Steem Engine and Future Apps

Downvoted in response to be what appears to be unnecessary vote buying. A worthy update like this would probably get plenty of organic votes and exposure. Why not give it a chance?

smooth

7y

RE: Vote Values

Votes on famous authors is going to be a very tough competitive game. Should you vote at 5 minutes, or 4m57s or 3m or??? Unless you are really an expert and think you can outcompete the other experts I

smooth

7y

RE: Huge eSteem iOS 2.2 update now available to Apple users

Would you please consider not stacking large purchased votes on these. I understand it is for visibility but with #NewSteem you are not competing for visibility against a page full of nonsense bought votes

smooth

7y

RE: Delegation Issue

A very large number of those million+ Steem accounts never corresponded with users. It was people who mined or registered large numbers of accounts because they could (either due to the nature of mining,

smooth

7y

RE: HF21 (and 22) are done, how do you feel?

I don't know how much of the reward pool was taken by the behaviors CLRC is designed to solve. Retrospectively is not the point. The point is to build a system that has the greatest likelihood of working

smooth

7y

RE: Well, that escalated quickly: HF 21/22 and bidbots

I did not understand that sentence. The way I see it, customer buys a vote from the bot, bot gets the fee as a liquid payment, passes it on to the delegators who will often, though not always, sell it

← Latest Older →