If you couldn't be bothered to write something yourself, then why in the name of Jesse Ventura's minigun should I take the time to read it myself?
My response isn't exactly direct, but I'll try to stay as close to your point as I can.
The question assumes I don't have anything of value to say if I haven't mastered the ability to clearly communicate it. I feel that overlooks a lot of potential simply because you don't like the medium.
I'm not a professional writer, author, journalist, or editor, but I still have thoughts on things. I also have another job I have to work to pay bills, and a strong desire to get better at playing my saxophone, so sitting down to craft my thoughts into a professional grade presentation isn't a priority.
However, sitting down for 5 or 10 minutes to get AI to compare this to that and point out why something appears one way or another to me, then extrapolating it into something I can review, edit, and post for discussion is beneficial to me for a number of reasons, and I fail to see why those opinions are less valid because I used AI to pull them from my thoughts and gussy it up for consumption.
I feel using AI enhances my ability to communicate whatever is on my mind with far greater efficiency than looking for each and every perfect word or inflection myself.
RE: AI vs. Human Creativity