This post is from a low-reputation account and contains an unverified outbound link. Be cautious before clicking external links.
RE: RE: Facts about tongue and Okinawa Island
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Facts about tongue and Okinawa Island

Words
275
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

Let me tell you a funny thing. I have never seen the source Facebook post steemcleaners@steemcleaners (a goon, a fascist, a thug) has mentioned in his comment. I read it somewhere else in 2018 and posted it to my website that is also about facts but in urdu. Here is the link to the fact about tougue in urdu on my website posted before 3 march 2018.

How come steemcleaners@steemcleaners (a goon, a thug, a fascist) can claim that i have copy pasted the fact from the source facebook post when i have never seen that post before ever in my life. This fact might be on thousands of websites with different wording. If my wording has matched with someone else's wording that doesn't mean i am copying their content.

Why can't steemcleaner@steemcleaner (a thug, a fascist, a goon) simply understand that facts aren't copyrighted.

Can steemcleaners@steemcleaners & steemcleaner@steemcleaner (goons, thugs and fascist of steemit) tell me who owns the rights to below mentioned facts:

  • Most of us have five fingers in each hand.
  • (let's post one more about tongue) most of us have one tongue.
  • Earth has one moon.

Did i just copy pasted someone else's content (because my wording might match with someone else's wording somewhere else on the internet)? Have i become a plagiarist by posting above facts even though i haven't given the sources?

No. I didn't do any of the above. And steemcleaner@steemcleaner & steemcleaners@steemcleaners (goons, thugs and fascists of steemit) have to understand this. They just can't call anyone a plagiarist by finding some random post or article on the internet as a source which might have some words matching.

@simply2koool: Let me tell you | Ecency