@dan, @lionflash, @marconmaste, @sim31, @aguerrido

@dan, @drwu, @jaytaylor-node, @novacryptollc, @sim31, @mikelennie

Thoughts here and in the previous posts assume that there exists an objective (correct) evaluation of human work. Any talk about "noise" would not make sense otherwise. @jamesmart already made

@shakhruz, @daodejing, @amih, @sim31, @mikelennie, @zeos

@mattlangston, @stan, @bishop3dcrea, @sim31, @highsteam1900, @cryptokens

Thanks for your response. Your feedback is very valuable. I didn't know about EPN, will look into it. State producer pay as described is not proportional to the state-producer’s stake in the underlying

@dan, @wildwex, @novacryptollc, @sim31, @highsteam1900, @recentchats

@sim31, @pnc, @lionflash, @novacryptollc, @machnbirdsparo, @recentchats

@hachtu, @atma.love, @berliangor, @amih, @mikelennie, @sim31

@gonflosca, @mikelennie, @sim31, @nathanielherman, @cryptokens, @nouser

For most projects, it's unrealistic to have visible deliverables, plus other members finding time to evaluate them, every week. Screenshots can help, but only so much (they alone can't eliminate the need

@douglasjames @johnjwilliamson @gonflosca @sim31 @harketypes

@wildwex, @jessethan, @sim31, @mattlangston, @amih, @nathanielherman

@jseymour, @val, @sim31, @drwu, @jaytaylor-node, @rimantas

@dansingjoy, @lionflash, @sim31, @atma.love, @timless

dan@hive, daodejing@hive, sim31@hive, SamaraShaw@none, densteem@hive, rank1@none

val@hive, jseymour@hive, amih@hive, mattlangston@hive, drew-bop@hive, sim31@hive

I Agree

You could argue that by agreeing to a constitution user agrees to ECAF. I think Dan has made this point somewhere and ECAF is definitely mentioned in a constitution. Both sides will always be EOS users,

What makes you think we can recreate on EOS a better justice system than the one we have in the real world? What makes you think we would be better off without a justice system? It's not like everything