I took a moment or two to reflect on a comment I received via email....
It is with regards to the so called elite establishment, and conspiracy theories "what if we are also unknowingly doing pr for them?" By exposing them.
I will use two linked instances to convey my point, 1 being 9-11 and the other the Iraq war, which are inextricably linked are they not?.
1 . On 9-11 I watched on TV live, the BBC reporting the WT7 had collapsed, whilst in the background of this live broadcast, WT7 was still standing!. It stood for a further 22 minutes, then was brought down by a controlled demolition. The BBC blamed Reuters for giving them the information too early. Nobody has bothered to ask - including the BBC, how Reuters knew this building was going to be pulled, in the first place!.
2 . If you look, you can find a video of Silverstein - the owner of the lease for the twin towers and wt7 - admitting to personally authorizing the controlled demolition of WTC 7. (lucky Larry hey)
After this evidence which is easily confirmed and found online, is digested. Logic dictates everything else is pure "noise".....
People arguing about planes or no planes. Footage of a planes fuselage coming out the other side of the towers, were there planes, were they military, what was the weird ball etc etc etc including did they use holographs, unknown technology etc etc is all pure "noise" and designed to lead people down a very unnecessary rabbit hole of pure noise!.
The real questions that should be asked are based on facts. The person interviewing Silverstein, as soon as he admitted he took the decision to "pull" the building, pull means demolish via explosives - The next question should have been "how did you manage to rig a burning building with explosives in a matter of hours, when it takes days or weeks, with the full cooperation with structural engineers, and explosives experts."
Logic dictates also, that with regards to the BBC, that "claim" to have investigative journalists at the BBC, should have led to a Panorama style expose with regards to Reuters prior knowledge of WT7's imminent demise.
Neither of the above happened.
Then we go onto where this event led us all to, the war on "terror" What ever that is meant to mean!.
So we take from the 9-11 inquiry, that Just like the Lord Chillcot inquiry in the UK, which I shall move swiftly onto in a moment, that 19 militants armed with box cutters, hijacked planes, all being Saudi nationals, and that directly led to a war with? Iraq!. Let that sink in for a moment or two.
So the correct question here, is why not Saudi Arabia, why Iraq?.....
"Chilcot report: key points from the Iraq inquiry " = https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/06/iraq-inquiry-key-points-from-the-chilcot-report
A government investigating a government, at the cost of over 10 million £ is never going to produce any other result than a self slap on the wrist, as proved by the above.
Now if it was you or I doing said report, it would have started and finished with 1 piece of evidence. 1 that is ominously omitted from the above expensive report.
It needed not a report on whether there was or not WMD'S as we all know there was not.
It neither needed a whole volume like the one the lord presented, as to who was at fault for faulty intelligence.
All it needed was a simple question to two People, one named Bush, the other named Blair.
That question? Thanks for asking.
Why did you agree via email to this war based on nothing but lies, it is that simple you see.
"Bombshell document shows Blair preparing to act as spin doctor for Bush, who was told 'the UK will follow our lead'"
Everything else is pure noise. The lord went down a 10 million £ rabbit hole, and took years to do it, at the tax payers expense. All he had to do was ask the correct question, not write a novel!.
And now the answer to your question at the start, yes, yes & yes, we are doing their pr. Bad PR at that.
Avoid the noise, avoid the smoke and mirrors, avoid the schills at all cost, concentrate on the facts, not the noise, and let the rest sort itself out, the way it will anyway. Just keep making the noise, but base it on fact!.
Have a superb day ahead.
Next question, how did 3 buildings all collapse into their own footprint, AKA as controlled demolition!.
15 Years Later, Physics Magazine Concludes: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition = https://thefreethoughtproject.com/physics-report-911-controlled-demolition/
